ror-resistant than high-order QAM.
Sounds like a good choice; so 2.064 Mb/s/(2b/S) = 1.032 MS/s, so I guess you're
aiming for a spreading factor > 10?
Cheers,
Marcus
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
From: marcus.muel...@ettus.com
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:03:32 +0100
Subject: Re:
guess
you're aiming for a spreading factor > 10?
Cheers,
Marcus
>
>
>
>
> ------------
> To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> From: marcus.muel...@ettus.com
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:03:32 +0100
> Subject
Hi Henry,
Interesting questions!
On 16.03.2016 03:48, Henry Barton wrote:
>
> Hi, does anyone know of any good tutorials that explain how to lock
> onto the clock of a QPSK signal and/or correlate? I know this is all
> very simple in GNUradio, but I hope someone knows of a website or,
> preferabl
t;need high throughput; my project aims to transmit 2.064 Mbit/sec in a 24 MHz
>channel in the 900 MHz band. I use QPSK/4QAM because it has 1/2 the bandwidth
>of BPSK while still being much more error-resistant than high-order QAM.
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
From: marcus.muel...@ettus
Hi, does anyone know of any good tutorials that explain how to lock onto the
clock of a QPSK signal and/or correlate? I know this is all very simple in
GNUradio, but I hope someone knows of a website or, preferably, a video series
that will explain this.
If I have 10 different QPSK users, sprea
