hem 😊 This is why I think that
>> the TX and RX do not need to be phase-synchronized.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> *Fernando Trejo*
>>
>> *From:* Discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:02:35 PM
> *To:* discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Measure and record the phase at the
> receiver
>
>
> Hi Fernando!
>
>
> On 03/22/2017 06:51 PM, Trejo Treviño, Fernando Alberto wrote:
>>
>> Hi
alf of Marcus Müller
> SENT: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:02:35 PM
> TO: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> SUBJECT: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Measure and record the phase at the receiver
>
> Hi Fernando!
> On 03/22/2017 06:51 PM, Trejo Treviño, Fernando Alberto wrote:
>
>> Hi Ma
need to be
phase-synchronized.
Best,
Fernando Trejo
From: Discuss-gnuradio
on
behalf of Marcus Müller
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:02:35 PM
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Measure and record the phase at the receiver
Hi
Hi Fernando!
On 03/22/2017 06:51 PM, Trejo Treviño, Fernando Alberto wrote:
>
> Hi Marcus!
>
>
> I am implementing a transmitter and a receiver model using two USRP
> N210s. Both are using GFSK modulation, and the data is transmitted at
> 2.4 GHz.
>
Cool :)
>
> I would like to add a phase shift a
PM
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Measure and record the phase at the receiver
Hi Fernando,
you'll need to be a little more specific what you mean with "a received signal"
and its phase – a PLL does keep track of the phase, but its job is, by
Hi Fernando,
you'll need to be a little more specific what you mean with "a received
signal" and its phase – a PLL does keep track of the phase, but its job
is, by definition, to "correct" the output so that it follows a specific
phase behaviour, so a PLL is certainly not what you're looking for
I am currently experimenting with a USRP N210, and I would like to measure and
record the phase of a received signal. I have read into the pre-installed PLL
blocks, but these do not provide the same functionality. Ideally this would be
done before the first iteration of the PLL, but I am also op
