3. Considering that we only need 650ms, no matter how long we
send(like 10s or more). We guess there is a fixed size cache in the
usrp and it send the cached data at a precise-controlled time, but I
can not persuade myself.
Can anyone interpret the strange phenomenon? Any suggestion is
Oooh, is there a configurable parameter for that in GRC yet?
On
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:33:34 -0700, Josh Blum wrote:
Also, I want to
point out:
There is a hook to control the size of these buffers in
gnuradio
(presumably to reduce flow graph latency). You may be
interested in
modifying
On 04/25/2012 11:53 AM, mle...@ripnet.com wrote:
Oooh, is there a configurable parameter for that in GRC yet?
Not yet. It would fit well in the options block. Pretty easy to add, but
it would be a little more change to get the parameter into the WX gui
top block class. Qtgui and nogui
original mail--
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:25:36 -0700
From: Josh Blumj...@ettus.com
To:discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question about USRP2 Tx procedure
Message-ID:4f884570.5010...@ettus.com
Content-Type
Hi everyone,
I now have some trouble in understanding how the usrp2 sent out the data.
My scenario of the test is:
We tried to control the usrp2 to transmit in a fixed time slot, such as 5
seconds. The code is:
tb = usrp.transmit_path() # Create the path
t1 = time.time()
On 04/13/2012 06:54 AM, Pan, Luyuan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I now have some trouble in understanding how the usrp2 sent out the
data. My scenario of the test is:
We tried to control the usrp2 to transmit in a fixed time slot, such as
5 seconds. The code is:
tb = usrp.transmit_path()
: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question about USRP2 Tx procedure
On 04/13/2012 06:54 AM, Pan, Luyuan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I now have some trouble in understanding how the usrp2 sent out
the data. My scenario of the test is:
We tried to control the usrp2 to transmit in a fixed time slot, such
as
5
On 04/13/2012 08:36 AM, Nowlan, Sean wrote:
A few questions about this: can you wait on the uhd async message
queue from a python script that has an instance of top_block? Would
you have to override wait() with a custom version that waits on the
queue (haven't checked if wait is a virtual
