Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh - 16.04 build failure

Hi Mike, I'd really like to get 16.04 support stable for the upcoming PyBOMBS 2.1.0 release. Thanks for testing newest code and all -- now we just need to figure out what's actually not working :) It might be PyBOMBS code *or* the recipes. I appreciate any logs! Cheers, M On 05/09/2016 10:54 AM,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh - 16.04 build failure

There was a bug (until May 1st) that would effectively disable running make a second time (with makewidth==1). I think you're running a PyBOMBS from before that (not that I'm saying you should have, this is not in the latest release yet), but it would give some better error message than this. Can y

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh - 16.04 build failure

I have built a new 16.04 i386 machine and found no issue, as well have updated existing Ubuntu machine from 15.04 to 16.04 and have everything working fine except gr-fosphor which needs freetype 2. I did have to update pybombs from git to get the updated machine working. Cam On 09/05/16 02:00

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh - 16.04 build failure

Mike, ! CppUnit is a long-standing dependency of GNU Radio, and this is really surprising. I'm currently looking at libcppunit.a from 16.04's libcppunit-dev.deb package; it definitely contains all the symbols. Sooo my guess is that gcc/ld tries to use the libcppunit.so (which seems to be stripped

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh - 16.04 build failure

Hm, that should, in my experience, be absolutely sufficient. I'll set up an absolutely virgin Ubuntu machine with that amount of RAM and try again. I know this might sound silly, but I think at this point with this seemingly "random" failure: Is there enough space on your hard drive? Best regards

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh - 16.04 build failure

Hi Mike, haven't seen that specific error before, and that error happening during linkage: How much RAM (+ Swap, if any) do you have? What does "free -m" say? Best regards, Marcus On 07.05.2016 23:47, Mike Willis wrote: > Why is it always so difficult? Assume something broken in latest Ubuntu LT

[Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh - 16.04 build failure

Why is it always so difficult? Assume something broken in latest Ubuntu LTS pybombs -vv install gnuradio > error.txt [ 62%] Built target pygen_volk_python_volk_modtool_fe055 [ 62%] Built target pmt_generated [ 62%] Built target pygen_volk_python_volk_modtool_00079 [ 62%] Built target volk_obj [ 6

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm curious about this -- this doesn't imply that you can't use the > beagleboard with the USRP, right? Only that you can't use the onboard > beagleboard DSP to essentially replace the USRP. Correct me if I'm

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh

Hello, I'm curious about this -- this doesn't imply that you can't use the beagleboard with the USRP, right? Only that you can't use the onboard beagleboard DSP to essentially replace the USRP. Correct me if I'm wrong. -andrew On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Gregory Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh

ge- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Brower Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:48 PM To: Bob McGwier Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh Bob- > It appears that TI has withdrawn the free offering of a linux version of

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh

Bob- > It appears that TI has withdrawn the free offering of a linux version of > its compilers that I pointed out earlier (in October) at this link. > > > https://www-a.ti.com/downloads/sds_support/targetcontent/LinuxDspTools/download.html > > This is very disappointing. Without free tools

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Bob McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It appears that TI has withdrawn the free offering of a linux version of its > compilers that I pointed out earlier (in October) at this link. > >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Bob McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It appears that TI has withdrawn the free offering of a linux version of its > compilers that I pointed out earlier (in October) at this link. > >

[Discuss-gnuradio] Sigh

It appears that TI has withdrawn the free offering of a linux version of its compilers that I pointed out earlier (in October) at this link. This is very disappointing. Without free tools it makes no sense