Brian Padalino wrote:
On 8/3/07, Zhuocheng Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You haven't really modeled what the board is doing properly, so your
code is probably doing exactly what it should in the circumstances
you're giving to it. You should get a dump of the raw packets
George's server i
On 8/3/07, Zhuocheng Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys:
>
> Here is the problem. If I receive a packet whose timestamp is out of date, I
> trash the packet. If there are packets afterwards that is a continuation of
> the first packet, I should trash those as well despite the fact that the
Hi guys:
Here is the problem. If I receive a packet whose timestamp is out of date, I
trash the packet. If there are packets afterwards that is a continuation of the
first packet, I should trash those as well despite the fact that their
timestamp indicates now. (They belong to the same high lev
