On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 08:21:57PM -0500, Michael Ford wrote:
> Why are there almost no constructors defined in any of the usrp1.py classes?
> I was chugging along until I realized that most of the classes have no
> constructors. Should I be using the shared pointer classes?
[In the future please
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:34:19PM -0500, Michael Ford wrote:
> This is all well for functions found in usrp.py, but even though I import
> usrp.py, and usrp.py successfully imports usrp1.py, I'm unable to
> successfully call functions from usrp1.py (i.e. read_aux_adc()). Calling the
> function wit
This is all well for functions found in usrp.py, but even though I
import usrp.py, and usrp.py successfully imports usrp1.py, I'm unable
to successfully call functions from usrp1.py (i.e. read_aux_adc()).
Calling the function with either a usrp- or usrp1- prefix gives me an
error of the module not
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Michael Ford wrote:
> after setting the PYTHONPATH variable to point to ~/gr-build/gr-usrp/src/
> (where usrp1.py is located), I ran my python test script, and got the
> following error:
>
>
> $ python test_sender.py Traceback (most recent call last):
>
after setting the PYTHONPATH variable to point to
~/gr-build/gr-usrp/src/ (where usrp1.py is located), I ran my python
test script, and got the following error:
$ python test_sender.py Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test_sender.py", line 22, in ?
import usrp1
File "/home/mford1/
I apologize for not responding earlier - I found the usrp1.i file not long after I made my post. I was confused at first because in my search for the read_aux_adc() function, I had originally found it in usrp_basic.{cc, h}
-Michael Ford-On 6/18/06, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Ju
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 03:23:53PM -0500, Michael Ford wrote:
> I'm trying to use a function in the usrp_basic class, but there's no SWIG .i
> script for it. While looking at the tutorials, I read that all processing
> blocks need to derive from the class gr_block. However, this isn't the case
> fo
I'm trying to use a function in the usrp_basic class, but there's no
SWIG .i script for it. While looking at the tutorials, I read that all
processing blocks need to derive from the class gr_block. However, this
isn't the case for usrp_basic. I guess this makes sense, as usrp_basic
isn't really a p
