Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2010-08-04 Thread Moeller
On 04.08.2010 19:35, Eric Blossom wrote: >> Why making a difference? Most code is compatible between Octave and Matlab. >> Even Matlab C++ MEX functions compile very well in Octave. >> The Octave scripts in gnuradio are not working in Matlab, because they use >> Octave-specials (comments as ## ins

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2010-08-04 Thread Eric Blossom
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 06:16:44PM +0200, Moeller wrote: > On 09.04.2008 18:08, Eric Blossom wrote: > > > > I have no interest in supporting an interface to MATLAB, or any other > > proprietary software for that matter. I'd be much more interested in > > working with Octave, or better yet, workin

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2010-08-04 Thread Moeller
On 09.04.2008 18:08, Eric Blossom wrote: > > I have no interest in supporting an interface to MATLAB, or any other > proprietary software for that matter. I'd be much more interested in > working with Octave, or better yet, working up an excellent Why making a difference? Most code is compatible

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Jeff Brower
al processing) developer communities. Supporting that approach with GNU Radio would only be advantageous to GNU Radio. -Jeff > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Gregory Maxwell > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:42

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Tom Rondeau
Eric Blossom wrote: I have no interest in supporting an interface to MATLAB, or any other proprietary software for that matter. I'd be much more interested in working with Octave, or better yet, working up an excellent interface to scipy. Just because EE's are trained in MATLAB, doesn't mean t

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Long, Jeffrey P.
eline application. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Maxwell Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:42 PM To: Jeff Brower Cc: Matt Ettus; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Jeff Brower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with Eric, well said. My one exception is your reasoning based on > what > features MATLAB and/or GNU Radio have or don't have. If you ask colleagues > "why do > you need to use MATLAB" they will say because it'

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Jeff Brower
Matt- > I think the problem is that there are basically 2 separate cultures > here. There are those coming from the CS and free software world, and > those coming from the radio, engineering, academic, industry, hardware, > etc. worlds. Those in the free software world often don't understand > h

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Eric Blossom
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:38:08AM -0700, Matt Ettus wrote: > > > I think the problem is that there are basically 2 separate cultures here. > There are those coming from the CS and free software world, and those > coming from the radio, engineering, academic, industry, hardware, etc. > worlds.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Eric Blossom
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 01:29:55PM -0400, Philip Balister wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jeff Brower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But there is no arguing with success, and MATLAB is highly successful. > > For GNU Radio to succeed it should gracefully > > navigate the RF community

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Matt Ettus
I think the problem is that there are basically 2 separate cultures here. There are those coming from the CS and free software world, and those coming from the radio, engineering, academic, industry, hardware, etc. worlds. Those in the free software world often don't understand how truly s

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Philip Balister
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jeff Brower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But there is no arguing with success, and MATLAB is highly successful. For > GNU Radio to succeed it should gracefully > navigate the RF community real world, and MATLAB is a key part of that. The pragmatic approach invo

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Jeff Brower
Eric- > On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:38:23AM -0500, Jeff Brower wrote: >> Greg- >> >> >> I am trying to figure out the Matlab interface to USRP. Although I >> >> could enable the communications between Matlab and GNU Radio, I am >> >> wondering whether it is possible to make Matlab hook to USRP dire

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jeff Brower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greg- > On days that I'm in philosophical mode, I completely agree. But the reality > is that MATLAB is far more widely used > than Octave. MATLAB is at the core of the commercial and academic RF > community, Octave is

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Eric Blossom
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:38:23AM -0500, Jeff Brower wrote: > Greg- > > >> I am trying to figure out the Matlab interface to USRP. Although I > >> could enable the communications between Matlab and GNU Radio, I am > >> wondering whether it is possible to make Matlab hook to USRP directly > >> wit

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Jeff Brower
Greg- > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Jeff Brower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] >> I understand completely your viewpoint. However, let me point out that one >> of your key objectives should be to >> increase popularity of GNU Radio software. One way to do this is to >> encourage an

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Jeff Brower
Pedro- >> I understand completely your viewpoint. However, let me point out that >> one of your key objectives should be to >> increase popularity of GNU Radio software. One way to do this is to >> encourage and support GNU Radio software examples >> that interface with MATLAB in some way. >> >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Jeff Brower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > I understand completely your viewpoint. However, let me point out that one > of your key objectives should be to > increase popularity of GNU Radio software. One way to do this is to > encourage and support GNU R

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Ignacio
I understand completely your viewpoint. However, let me point out that one of your key objectives should be to increase popularity of GNU Radio software. One way to do this is to encourage and support GNU Radio software examples that interface with MATLAB in some way. Yes, you are right i

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Jeff Brower
Greg- >> I am trying to figure out the Matlab interface to USRP. Although I >> could enable the communications between Matlab and GNU Radio, I am >> wondering whether it is possible to make Matlab hook to USRP directly >> without GNU radio. Thank you very much! > > (This isn't entirely directed at

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Philip Balister
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There has been some recent discussion about using Free software that has > matlab-like features, like octave and freemat. > > http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/ > http://freemat.sourceforge.net/ I did some poking arou

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP

2008-04-09 Thread Greg Troxel
"Pu, Di" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am trying to figure out the Matlab interface to USRP. Although I > could enable the communications between Matlab and GNU Radio, I am > wondering whether it is possible to make Matlab hook to USRP directly > without GNU radio. Thank you very much! (This is