Re: SimpleAgenda 0.45

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 06:37:24PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: > Hi all, > > After a long long while here is a new release of SimpleAgenda. You can > grab it here : > > https://github.com/poroussel/simpleagenda/releases/tag/v0.45 And a link to the source code itself :

SimpleAgenda 0.45

Hi all, After a long long while here is a new release of SimpleAgenda. You can grab it here : https://github.com/poroussel/simpleagenda/releases/tag/v0.45 >From the NEWS file : version 0.45 (2021/10/10) * Migrate testsuite from ObjcUnit to the GNUstep Test Framework patch fro

SimpleAgenda needs a maintainer

Hi all, As some of you may have noticed I haven't been really acrive in the GNUstep world lately, for a variety of reasons. I recently received a bug report for SimpleAgenda and started to investigate it but I can't find the time or energy to finish the work. If you're interested in keeping this

Re: SimpleAgenda on FreeBSD

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:54:39AM +0200, Edwin Ancaer wrote: > Sorry for the wrong screenshot. Apparently no recall in Gmail. Here is the > correct one: Could you send me your GNUstep configuration (fonts, font sizes etc) and tell what backend is in use ? Thanks, Philippe -- Jimi Hendrix Died

Re: SimpleAgenda on FreeBSD

Hi all, On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:58:59PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > Hi, > > On 2018-07-12 10:09:04 + Ivan Vučica wrote: > > > Did this help? > > > > If not, a hacky thing I would do is, I would try: > > CFLAGS="-isystem /usr/local/include" ./configure > > instead. > > > > (Possi

Re: GNUMail sources

Hi Le 19/05/2016 15:27, Steven R. Baker a écrit : My first order of business is to get good replacements for AddressBook, Calendar, and Mail from OS X. I am currently working on some UI improvements to SimpleAgenda, and after that I'll focus on CardDav/CalDav support. The only thing I'm missin

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:48:14AM +0200, Michele Bert wrote: > > What does 'apt-get upgrade' gives you ? > > > > Here you are: > The following packages have been kept back: > affiche.app agenda.app easydiff.app gnustep-back0.24-cairo > gnustep-base-runtime gnustep-gpbs gnustep-gui-common gnust

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:13:21PM +0200, Michele Bert wrote: > 2015-10-11 21:30 GMT+02:00 Philippe Roussel : > > > Well, 12.04 is getting really old... You could try the wheezy packages > > at http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/packages/wheezy/i386/ but I > > have no i

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Hi Mick, On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:56:25AM +0200, Michele Bert wrote: > 2015-06-03 13:14 GMT+02:00 Philippe Roussel : > > Hi all, > > > > I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and wheezy (i386 > > and amd64). Packages are built with the available cla

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 01:52:08PM +0200, Alessandro Sangiuliano wrote: > Should not be a problem for Philippe to compile everything present > in his private repo with clang (gnustep and stepchat) and then > package them making .deb packages and pushing them in the repo. It just takes time and so

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:06:59PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:14:05PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and wheezy (i386 > > and amd64). Packages are built with the a

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:25:28PM +1000, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote: > > you would like to add another package > > StepChat > > Like much of Etoile stuff, I understand that StepChat must be > compiled with clang and requires a clang-compiled GNUstep, and I would > like to see all this stuff in

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:14:05PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: > Hi all, > > I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and wheezy (i386 > and amd64). Packages are built with the available clang and libobjc2 > (called libobjcgs). > > Please note that I haven

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Hi, On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > > Perhaps adding BatMon.app for laptop users could be useful. Ok, I can try and see if it builds without problem. > Did you have any troubles building or local patches to apply? Not sure, I would have to check all packages

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:15:41AM +, Ivan Vučica wrote: > > The build currently breaks within gnustep-base. I have a patch from > November for Source/Additions/GSObjCRuntime.m and Source/NSException.m, but > it's hacky. Plus, I fear touching such low-level files. I'll eventually > send this o

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:07:09AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 4 Jun 2015, at 08:51, Philippe Roussel wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:11:21PM +1000, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote: > >> Oh, and my understanding is that Debian's gnustep-* packages are

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:11:21PM +1000, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote: > Oh, and my understanding is that Debian's gnustep-* packages are > compiled using gcc. Am I wrong? If not, then how may this valuable set > of packages compiled with clang be put into the main Debian > repositories? You wo

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

opplerkit with recent versions of poppler. > Do you used clang for the build process? See below. > > Il giorno 03/giu/2015, alle ore 13:14, Philippe Roussel > > ha scritto: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and whee

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:09:38PM +1000, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote: > Thanks. Would like to add netclasses and talksoup. Will do if possible. Thanks, Philippe -- Its always easier short term to pee in the pond than install a toilet - it's just not a good long term plan. Alan Cox __

Re: Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 03:15:16PM +, Ivan Vučica wrote: > Do you have documentation/scripts for your build process? I have some ugly scripts and a Makefile but the build itself is done using pbuilder. I'm using source files checked out from the different repositories with debian/ folders adde

Debian and Ubuntu packages - 2015/06/03

Hi all, I updated packages for sid (amd64), trusty (amd64) and wheezy (i386 and amd64). Packages are built with the available clang and libobjc2 (called libobjcgs). Please note that I haven't tested any of this yet. Packages list (some may be missing): * gnustep-{make,base,gui,back} and related

Re: GORM and NSCollectionView

Hi Fred, On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Fred Kiefer wrote: [snip] > Now the flickering is gone for me. I still have the other problem of > corrupted subview display after extensive resize, but I wont be looking > into that today. I just will commit my changes and you all should try to

Re: GNUStep on Fedora 21

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 06:35:05AM -0700, jimse...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 7:18:15 AM UTC-4, Nerijus Baliunas wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 15:21:17 -0700 (PDT) jimse...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > All installed OK, but.. NO GNUstep.sh ! > > > > > > But it says it

Re: Ubuntu packages

On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:43:30PM +0100, Liam Proven wrote: > On 3 November 2014 07:58, Philippe Roussel wrote: > > Yeah, I never found the energy to understand why my (stupid) build > > system stopped working after a svn update on gnustep-core... > > > > I soon wil

Re: Wondering if ~/GNUstep shouldn't be ~/.GNUstep (i.e. hidden..)

Hi, On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:07:51PM -0600, Stefan wrote: > > > On November 4, 2014 2:57:09 PM CST, Gregory Casamento > wrote: > >Stefan, > > > >If you look at the bug, part of the issue is that people who don't > >know that the tool they are using utilizes GNUstep are upset because > >it cr

Re: Ubuntu packages

Hi, On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 04:34:59PM +0100, Liam Proven wrote: > I see that Ivan Vučica has made some Ubuntu packages of the core > system, but Philippe, are you still building your Ubuntu/Debian > GNUstep packages as well? I see no updates for a long time -- about a > year ago. :¬( Yeah, I nev

Re: NSOperationQueue - Killed after 40 seconds

[gnustep-discuss back on cc] On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:40:07AM +, Ivan Vučica wrote: > On 22.03.2014. 17:23, Philippe Roussel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 05:17:55PM +0100, Matthias Rudolph wrote: > >> @interface ValueRow : NSObjec

Re: NSOperationQueue - Killed after 40 seconds

Hi, On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 05:17:55PM +0100, Matthias Rudolph wrote: > Hi Ivan, hi Matt, > thanks for your responses. > > It seems it is an memory allocation problem. dmsg: Out Of Memory. Thanks for > the hint ;-) > > My class: > > @interface ValueRow : NSObject { > int value[500]; >

Re: Up-to-date GNUStep core now available as Debian/Ubuntu packages

On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 01:05:06PM +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: > > Given the resounding silence from Gregory, Richard and Adam, one can > probably forget about moving such an effort to one of the FSF servers, > so this one is very welcome. Not only for building the packages, also > for making sure

Re: Up-to-date GNUStep core now available as Debian/Ubuntu packages

Hi Markus On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 02:13:56PM +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: > > On which host could I do this? For myself I have only a commodity PC > available which is turned off when I'm on vacation or at sleep. Updating > the packages is about 15 minutes of CPU time per update, minimum space > r

Re: gnustep on wheezy

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 06:26:01PM +, Ivan Vučica wrote: > I specifically recommended the curses UI instead of just using CLI, because > you can then play with scenarios that will resolve the conflicts/missing > deps in a nicer UI. > > Obviously libobjcgs, whatever that is, is missing, and the

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:34:45PM +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: > Am 30.11.2013 11:53, schrieb Philippe Roussel: > > Well, it may take a while. On my build machine pbuilder (or some other > > script it uses) doesn't recognize saucy as a distribution so I'll have > > t

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 03:44:08PM +, Liam Proven wrote: > On 30 November 2013 10:53, Philippe Roussel wrote: > > I would also like to limit the number of ubuntu versions I build > > packages for so if saucy comes in, another one will go out. > > Seriously, now that

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:46:28PM +, Liam Proven wrote: > On 25 November 2013 16:59, Philippe Roussel wrote: > > > > I'll try to update the packages this week. > > May I ask if or when you're planning to build packages for Saucy > (Ubuntu 13.10)? I j

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:31:42PM +0100, Eric Brunel wrote: > Ouch… My mistake… I thought the ending '/' was not significant, it > looks like it is. With it, it's working, I could get your GWorkspace > version instead of the old Ubuntu one, so I guess everything else > will be working. That will t

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 03:15:42PM +0100, Eric Brunel wrote: > Hello again, > > On 25 nov. 13, at 13:13, Philippe Roussel wrote: > >I just did the following on quantal i386 : > > > >wget -qO - http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/GPG-PUBLIC-KEY | > >sudo apt-key a

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

Hi, On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:50:42AM +0100, Eric Brunel wrote: > Hello all, > > Sorry to resurrect an old thread. I just tried to install some of > the packages below on Quantal (XUbuntu flavour), and it seems it > won't work. First, adding the given repository line to > /etc/apt/sources.list e

Re: Kickstarter was not successful... but it did help things...

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 06:11:04PM -0700, Eric Wasylishen wrote: > Hi, > We haven't packaged them for release yet, but in October I worked on > the two Étoilé themes (designed by Jesse Ross) and they are now > reasonably complete. I attached some screenshots, compare with the > original mockup at:

Re: Kickstarter was not successful... but it did help things...

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:40:57PM +, Slex Sangiuliano wrote: > > Put screenshots of GNUstep looking 'sexier' on the website. Make them more > > prominent than the existing theme by all means (eg. put them first and > > bigger). To find out which works best (ie is most popular) we could hav

Re: Ubuntu Precise 64 bits Packages

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:35:14PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 02:59:33PM -0200, Thiago F Macedo wrote: > > I'm trying to install the packages from > > http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/packages/ > > But currently Pre

Re: Ubuntu Precise 64 bits Packages

Hi Thiago, On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 02:59:33PM -0200, Thiago F Macedo wrote: > I'm trying to install the packages from > http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/packages/ > But currently Precise do not have a candidate for 64 systems. > > > Any way to deliver them ? Or should I better setup from sour

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:58:57PM +0100, Michele Bert wrote: > 2013/11/8 Philippe Roussel > > > Done for i386 > > > Thanks. > But if you want to lought: I cannot install it, because few (required) > packages are classified by company firewall as 'Sport/Rec

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:45:58PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 11:19:57AM +0100, Michele Bert wrote: > > 2013/11/8 Philippe Roussel > > > > > Ubuntu 12.04 is precise so you can add something like the following > > > (i

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 11:19:57AM +0100, Michele Bert wrote: > 2013/11/8 Philippe Roussel > > > Ubuntu 12.04 is precise so you can add something like the following > > (if on 32 bits) to apt sources.list. > > > > deb http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/packages/pre

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

Hi, On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:38:46AM +0100, Michele Bert wrote: > 2013/9/27 Philippe Roussel > > > Hi, > > > > I just updated some packages for > > > > - wheezy (i386, amnd64) > > - precise (i386, amd64) > > - quantal (i386, amd64) &

Re: building on debian wheezy 7.0

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:17:04AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 03/11/13 Philippe Roussel said: > > > What do you mean ? Can you start it and browse your files or not ? > > I can look at them but I can't associate them with any useful applications. I > think t

Re: building on debian wheezy 7.0

Hi, On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 10:25:50PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 03/11/13 Riccardo Mottola said: > > > >> Just add the corresponding repository. Something like: > > >> > > >> deb http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/packages/wheezy/i386/ ./ > > So, I've tried that, and while WindowMa

Re: ANN: Graphos 0.5

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:52:54PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > >Hey, that might happen sooner that you think (even if I'm not a debian > >packager) ! > Do you mean you might get your packages sponsored? Nope, I meant I could add Graphos to the list of .deb I build, it should be easy. Philipp

Re: ANN: Graphos 0.5

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 02:46:21PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > Thanks for packaging guys, your work is very important! Many users > discover us thorugh packages and complete and up-to-date packages > just present us better! Our apps already lack some care, if people > use old stuff, it makes t

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

Hi James, On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 04:01:38PM +1100, James Carthew wrote: > I've had time now to install and use the Debian packages. Really > impressed/happy with them. I'm trying to use GDL2, and am unable to locate > the Palette for Gorm that integrates the database objects. Do you know > where

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 06:06:07PM +0200, Markus Hitter wrote: > > Wait ... I see my mistake. I added the i386 path of your repo while > running an amd64 installation. Thus, the packages in the Ubuntu repo are > preferred. Changed this and ... voilá, it works. If you're on amd64 you could use rar

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 01:39:52PM +0200, Markus Hitter wrote: > > http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/GPG-PUBLIC-KEY > > Thanks. Accordingly, the sequence to add your repo is as following: > > - - - > For example, for precise x86 you can add this line to sources.list, in > Synaptic or in System

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:51:49PM +0200, Markus Hitter wrote: > Von: Philippe Roussel > Datum: 29. September 2013 16:22:36 GMT+02:00 > > > Everything is under the following url : > > > > http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/packages/ > > > > For

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:32:55PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:56:28AM -0700, Gabriel Sulliger wrote: > > Nice what you did. I love the goals of the Hurd, and with the latest > > Debian Hurd 2013 release, I think that the Hurd

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

Hi Gabriel, On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:56:28AM -0700, Gabriel Sulliger wrote: > Nice what you did. I love the goals of the Hurd, and with the latest > Debian Hurd 2013 release, I think that the Hurd is going better each > day. So you updated packages for i386 and AMD64 processors > architectures a

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:33:02AM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > The first errors come I suppose from clang/libobjc2 . They shouldn't be > fatal. > > The latter instead show that the TalkSoup bundles did not load. They > should be in Library/ApplicationSupport/TalkSoup > > Philippe, does the p

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

Hi James, On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:22:31AM +1000, James Carthew wrote: > 2013-10-03 06:51:20.636 TalkSoup[10905] Could not load 'Ignore' from '()' > 2013-10-03 06:51:20.636 TalkSoup[10905] Could not load 'MessageInTab' from > '()' > 2013-10-03 06:51:20.636 TalkSoup[10905] Could not load 'Coloriz

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

Hi Ivan, On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 09:16:47PM +0200, Ivan Vučica wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > Did you document in some way how you produce the packages? Do you have some > scripts to do so? No documentation (yet), just a makefile using pbuilder and some ugly scripts I'm afraid. Basically I just grab

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:22:36PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: > > Packages list : > * gnustep-{make,base,gui,back} and related dev packages > * gdl2 > * easydiff > * edenmath > * pantomime > * gnumail > * gorm > * projectcenter > * gworkspace > *

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:47:34PM +0200, Markus Hitter wrote: > > Am 27.09.2013 um 21:55 schrieb Philippe Roussel: > > >I just updated some packages for > > > > - wheezy (i386, amnd64) > > - precise (i386, amd64) > > - quantal (i386, amd64) > >

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 09:55:31PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated some packages for > > - wheezy (i386, amnd64) > - precise (i386, amd64) > - quantal (i386, amd64) > - raring (amd64) - sid (amd64), completely untested -- Jimi Hen

Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-09-27

Hi, I just updated some packages for - wheezy (i386, amnd64) - precise (i386, amd64) - quantal (i386, amd64) - raring (amd64) Philippe -- In some places, "lawyer" and "liar" are homonyms; in all places, "lawyer" and "liar" are synonyms.

Re: Themes (again)

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Xavier Brochard wrote: > On 2013-09-27 18:56:05 +0200 Philippe Roussel > > > >Have you tried the packages I build from time to time ? There are > >debian and ubuntu versions. > > And it works well ! > But we are missing so

Re: Themes (again)

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Liam Proven wrote: > > With modest work, it is possible to produce packages that will install > on both Ubuntu and Debian - that would be best of all. Have you tried the packages I build from time to time ? There are debian and ubuntu versions. Philippe

Re: display UTF-8 characters

Hi, On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:00:11AM +0200, Ivan Vučica wrote: > So if I see correctly, in SimpleAgenda month names are incorrectly > decoded as if they were encoded in some singlebyte encoding? I'm using gnustep from svn with cairo backend and here's what I get with SimpleAgenda. It looks lik

Re: display UTF-8 characters

Hi, On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 07:26:04PM +0300, Nerijus Baliunas wrote: > On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 01:13:41 +0900 "Lee, Seong-Gu" wrote: > > > How about trying "export GNUSTEP_STRING_ENCODING=NSUTF8StringEncoding" > > at bash or "setenv GNUSTEP_STRING_ENCODING NSUTF8StringEncoding" at csh? > > In my c

Re: Addresses not importing vcards files

Hi Sebastian, On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 02:27:56PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Hi, > > while testing Addresses for a new release, I figured there are a couple of > problems. > Riccardo suggested to forward them here, I'll separate them in different > threads. > > First problem is that A

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-08-21

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:44:00PM +0200, Philippe Roussel wrote: > Hi all, > > I've pushed an update of some packages and added gdl2 back to the list. FYI I added packages for ubuntu raring 64 bits. Philippe -- The brain is a wonderful organ; it starts working the moment you

Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-08-21

Hi all, I've pushed an update of some packages and added gdl2 back to the list. Packages list : * gnustep-{make,base,gui,back} and related dev packages * gdl2 * easydiff * edenmath * pantomime * gnumail * gorm * projectcenter * gworkspace * gnustep-examples * laternamagica * lusernet

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-28

Hi, On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 08:55:37PM -0500, Austin Clow wrote: > When I add the source on the latest Ubuntu, it warns that it is not working > due to non availability of a public key. I did enter "deb > http://coyote.octets.fr/pub/gnustep/packages/precise/i386/ ./" as the source > and verifie

Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-08-14

Hi all, I updated packages for quantal, precise and wheezy, for both i386 and amd64. They're built with clang from their respective distributions and with libobjc2 from svn. I'm still having problems with raring and sid but for those interested wheezy packages seem to work under sid. Packages li

Re: Request for testers : wheezy packages built with clang and libobjc2

Hi Eric, On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:36:00AM -0600, Eric Wasylishen wrote: > Hi Philippe, > I just tested these a bit on a fresh Debian Sid install. > They worked great, I was able to build and run the test suite of a framework > I'm working on for Étoilé. That's good to know, thanks a lot for te

Request for testers : wheezy packages built with clang and libobjc2

Hi all, I just pushed out packages for debian wheezy 64 bits built with clang and libobjc2 and I'd love to have some feedback. Those packages replace the previous wheezy 64 bits gcc packages but I'm not sure an apt-get upgrade will do the trick, you will probably have to remove all gnustep packag

Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-28

Hi all, I updated packages for precise and wheezy, for both i386 and amd64, and for quantal amd64. Packages list : * gnustep-{make,base,gui,back} and related dev packages * easydiff * edenmath * pantomime * gnumail * gorm * projectcenter * gworkspace * gnustep-examples * laternamagica

Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-12

Hi, I updated gnustep-{make,base,gui,back} and related dev packages this morning. Philippe ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07

Hi Ivan, On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 02:37:26PM +0200, Ivan Vučica wrote: > I'm interested in what broke with CoreBase/Opal/QuartzCore? CoreBase compilation failed with the following message (I haven't looked at it, I'm lazy...) and Opal and QuartzCore depend on CoreBase. Making all for library libg

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07

Hi, On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:42:00AM +0200, Lundberg, Johannes wrote: > Hi Philippe > > Good job! Thanks ! > Does this package support Obj-C 2 features like properties and blocks? Packages are compiled with gcc and gcc's libobjc so objective-c 2 support is limited. I *think* the latest verio

Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07

Hi all, I updated packages for precise and wheezy, for both i386 and amd64, and for quantal amd64. This time I had to remove gdl2, corebase, opal and quartzcore from the list because of problems compiling with gcc. Packages list : * gnustep-{make,base,gui,back} and related dev packages * easyd

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-04-10

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:32:10PM +1000, Mark Aufflick wrote: > It seems not. I can make a new ProjectCenter project, but when I try > to build it, the build window just says "waiting" and nothing > happens. Any tips? Or should I not be trying to use these packages > for development? Try compilin

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-04-10

Hi Mark, On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:49:01AM +1000, Mark Aufflick wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > This is great - I have GNUmail up and running super easy with your > packages. I notice there are -dev packages and I'm hoping these can > help me avoid the tricky compile process (although I can't avoid it

Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-04-10

Hi all, I updated packages for precise and wheezy, for both i386 and amd64, and for quantal amd64 (some packages may be missing for a specific distribution/architecture combo). Packages list : * gnustep-{make,base,gui,back} and related dev packages * gdl2 * easydiff * edenmath * pantomime *

Re: Problem with SimpleAgenda on new GNUstep

On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:38:08PM -0800, Luis Garcia Alanis wrote: > yes I meant that :) but gmail miss behaved :) > > Don't know how to use gdb yet :( Before that, check that you're using the latest svn revision of gnustep gui, to be sure you have Fred's bugfix. > how do you break on gdb? and

Re: Problem with SimpleAgenda on new GNUstep

On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:34:50PM -0800, Luis Garcia Alanis wrote: > Tried the latest svn and it still hang on the latest GNUstep thunk 64bit. > With clang and libobjc2. > > svn://coyote.octets.fr/**gnustep/SimpleAgenda/trunk > > > Am I lookin

Re: Problem with SimpleAgenda on new GNUstep

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:35:30PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > > I decided that this was caused by some wired rounding error between > > CGFloat and float, where the float value was bigger than the > > corresponding CGFloat value. So I changed the floats in the > > ty

Re: Problem with SimpleAgenda on new GNUstep

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:14:27PM +0100, Fred Kiefer wrote: > > Looks like we are doing the same debugging in parallel :-) Well, I was just looking around, you did the debugging ! > I decided that this was caused by some wired rounding error between > CGFloat and float, where the float value wa

Re: Problem with SimpleAgenda on new GNUstep

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 07:22:57AM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:06:03PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:51:32PM +, Richard Stonehouse wrote: > > > >Is this on 64 bits ? > > > > > > Yes; I have

Re: Problem with SimpleAgenda on new GNUstep

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:06:03PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:51:32PM +, Richard Stonehouse wrote: > > >Is this on 64 bits ? > > > > Yes; I haven't built the new GNUstep on 32-bit yet. I'll try to get > > that d

Re: Problem with SimpleAgenda on new GNUstep

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:01:44AM +, Richard Stonehouse wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:06:03PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:51:32PM +, Richard Stonehouse wrote: > >>>Is this on 64 bits ? > >> > >>Yes; I haven'

Re: Problem with SimpleAgenda on new GNUstep

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:51:32PM +, Richard Stonehouse wrote: > >Is this on 64 bits ? > > Yes; I haven't built the new GNUstep on 32-bit yet. I'll try to get > that done tonight. > > >Which libobjc and compiler ? > > GCC 4.7 with libobjc1, from the openSUSE 12.2 release. Thanks. I'll try

Re: Problem with SimpleAgenda on new GNUstep

Hi Richard, On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:51:54PM +, Richard Stonehouse wrote: > When I try to run SimpleAgenda under the latest GNUstep core > libraries, it immediately goes into a solid CPU loop which can only > be got out of by killing SimpleAgenda. > > This did not occur under the previous v

Re: Submenus take 1 second to appear

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:50:24PM +0100, Fred Kiefer wrote: > On 26.02.2013 22:07, Philippe Roussel wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 01:28:31PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > >>It probably is specific to kwin, I've only been using this window > >>manager f

Re: Submenus take 1 second to appear

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 01:28:31PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > It probably is specific to kwin, I've only been using this window > manager for a few days and never saw this effect before. I'll try with > another wm and report back. Menus work fine under unity so GNUstep

Re: Submenus take 1 second to appear

Hi Riccardo On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 01:12:45PM +0100, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > Philippe Roussel wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >I just updated gnustep core to latest svn and when I click on a menu > >entry in any application the submenu takes like 1

Submenus take 1 second to appear

Hi all, I just updated gnustep core to latest svn and when I click on a menu entry in any application the submenu takes like 1 second to appear. I'm not sure this is a new behaviour, I haven't run GNUstep apps recently. I using kwin as my window manager. Anyone else seeing this ? Philippe -- U

Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-02-20

Hi all, I updated packages for precise and wheezy, for both i386 and amd64, and for quantal amd64 with the latest sources I could find (svn trunk etc). I haven't had time to work on the packages themselves or to test them so problems that existed on the previous release are probably still present

Re: Strange behaviour regarding miniaturization and menus

On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:39:27AM +0100, Andreas Schik wrote: > Hello Phillipe, > > Could you update GNUstep packages and try again ? There have been a > > lot of commits in gnustep/core/* recently and I rebuilt core packages > > few days ago. > > Ok, I'll try that. One question, though. The Ubun

Re: Strange behaviour regarding miniaturization and menus

Hi Andreas, On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:25:20AM +0100, Andreas Schik wrote: > Hi all, > I am on Ubuntu 12.04 and XFCE and am using gsim to handle app icons and > mini windows. This setup works really fine so far. Since a > couple of days, however, I am experiencing strange problems. > I used to tak

Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-01-25

Hi Ivan, On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 08:35:59PM +0100, Ivan Vučica wrote: > Hi Matt, > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Matt Rice wrote: > > > most likely you just need to add -lcairo to hello_opal, > > there has been a change in behavior of gnu ld such that something that > > references a librar

Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-01-25

Hi all, I updated packages for precise and wheezy, for both i386 and amd64, and for quantal amd64. Note : some packages may be missing for a distribution/architecture combo, for example when an api change breaks the compilation. Packages list : * gnustep-{make,base,gui,back} and related dev pac

Re: GWorkspace segfaults

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:33:05PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > > GWorkspace from svn is available for wheezy but you will have to > update all GNUstep packages with mine I'm afraid. Take a look here : By the way, I just updated GWorkspace package with your latest fixes (and

  1   2   3   4   >