http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2002/03/tld.htm
I guess they are still around...
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Doug Braun at Emerge2 wrote:
> It is too bad that spams about rogue unofficial unsupported TLDs (like
> .usa) cannot be blocked from discuss-list ... the person didn't even
> identify themselves with a name ... we don't need to see their
> advertisement spams, or anyone else's
Hey we've missed ya.
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> My what a pleasant way to guarantee that no one that reads this list
> will ever become a reseller for your services. You've certainly made up
> my mind about your services should anyone ask my opinion.
>
> Happy new year to those
I second that Ross :)
and a BIG Happy New year to All Resellers.
Regards
Mitchell
http://www.allover.ca
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
Sent: January 6, 2003 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
On 06 1 2003 at 2:07 pm -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>(www.dotworlds.net) has been receiving record numbers of hits as users
>search for .USA and .US state domain names, download the browser plugin
>and activate their browsers for dotWORLDS domains.
wtf...? Is this a joke?
I have a revolutio
SCAM! SCAM! SCAM!
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dotWORLDS Ltd., (www.dotworlds.net), has announced a successful launch
> of its .USA and .US state domain name and registrar systems. The company
It is too bad that spams about rogue unofficial unsupported TLDs (like
.usa) cannot be blocked from discuss-list ... the person didn't even
identify themselves with a name ... we don't need to see their
advertisement spams, or anyone else's ads/spams, on this list...
At 02:07 PM 1/6/03, you wro
Ugh.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 14:07:24 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: dotWORLDS Success - .USA domains now available
>
> dotWORLDS Ltd., (www.dotworlds.net), has announced a successful launch of its
> .USA and .US state domain name and registrar systems. The
> dotWORLDS Ltd., (www.dotworlds.net), has announced a
> successful launch of its .USA and .US state domain name and
My what a pleasant way to guarantee that no one that reads this list
will ever become a reseller for your services. You've certainly made up
my mind about your services should a
dotWORLDS Ltd., (www.dotworlds.net), has announced a successful launch of its .USA and
.US state domain name and registrar systems. The company beat out expectations of a
November launch, implementing its structure and systems in October 2002, to the
delight of Internet users around the globe.
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Rr Wex wrote:
>
> Is it acceptable for an entity to trademark a domain extension? Our country
> registrar is attempting to trademark the extension that they manage
> (Singapore - .SG) for class 38 (email, network, communications, etc).
I dont don't know if a top level domain
They are currently "synching" their lists to make sure it is consistent,
but until they do,
Just choose another type, it actually doesn't change the format of the cert
they send you, it is for support purposes only.
Hope that helps.
Kim Phelan
Product Manager
Tucows, Inc.
-Original Mes
Can anybody shed some light on this? I tried to get a Geotrust Quick SSL
cert for O'Reilly Pro ver 2.37 but can't find that type of cert listed.
I tried to run through the new system but my order #4627 would not go
through without some type of cert selected.
Is this an oversight, did I miss some
Is it acceptable for an entity to trademark a domain extension? Our country
registrar is attempting to trademark the extension that they manage
(Singapore - .SG) for class 38 (email, network, communications, etc).
I believe that this is inappropriate and I believe that it says so here
http://
14 matches
Mail list logo
