Title: Message
Iam
interestedin feedback on Able Commerce. I have a client that
is very interested in moving to that package, andwould welcome
yourthoughtson any support issues, performance, or implementation
issues.
Any thoughts on the
Dot Net version vs. the CFMX version would also be
Title: Message
I use CFMX 5.5 version of Able in my
store.
I have never used any other cart, but
every day I am impressed with its potential and flexibility.
The only thing that it WILL NOT DO that I
need it to do is:
The products have a one to one
relationship with the vendor of
Title: Message
Thanks
Robert and Leon for the feedback.
Paul
Morton
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert ReilSent:
Wednesday, June 07, 2006 11:13 AMTo:
discussion@acfug.orgSubject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able
Title: Message
And agree a bit ridiculous if it is a
licensing error.
Cody
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Morton
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006
3:19 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT:
Able Commerce
I
Title: Message
Paul,
Also keep in mind that the CF version is
fairly new compared to the Dot Net (old ASP) version. On a project I
worked on in the past I found it odd they actually sold a beta. But the
good thing is I think for the money you can definitely get some great built in
Title: Message
Yes and it looks like you are handling it
well by just redirecting back to www.example.com
from example.com.
Cody
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leon
Oosterwijk
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006
11:24 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
