ED]
01/18/2007 03:46 PM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Just to be clear the security aspect is of no issue here. I am not
interested in doing this for security.
I agree with those who have posted about the co
Web Development Applications Architect
Federal Reserve Bank - Atlanta
Office (404) 498-8449
Derrick Peavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/18/2007 03:46 PM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Just
ile system? You're already having to do a DB
lookup to know what to retrieve--that's the crucial difference between
"page furniture" and data. But whatever.
Josh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:
eady having to do a DB lookup to know what to retrieve--that's
the crucial difference between "page furniture" and data. But
whatever.
Josh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:50 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
S
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:27 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Honestly, there's not really a benefit per se. There might be a rare case
now and then for doing this, but rea
On Behalf Of Douglas Knudsen
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:13 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
in this case I'd suggest implementing J2EE container security. You can
secure any resource this way.
DK
On 1/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTEC
h* Tommy *cough*
mcg
*John Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/18/2007 02:49 PM Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org cc
Subject
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I agree that with strict image security it is an option. Give
rsday, January 18, 2007 2:42 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Not true--there can be a benefits: data management & security. Derrick
started this whole discussion on the BlueDragon Interest list. I guess he
brought it here because no one could tell him
ussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Right--so to be clear Derrick is looking to not use the tag but to
instead use some other mechanism such that the image isn't a separate file
that is referenced (as is the case with the tag) but is act
ED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:27 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Honestly, there's not really a benefit per se. There might be a rare case
now and then for doing this, but really you should probably just use the
fil
2007 10:27 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Honestly, there's not really a benefit per se. There might be a rare case
now and then for doing this, but really you should probably just use the
filesystem for what it's design for, storing files.
J
se?
Josh
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Peavy
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:24 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Douglas, yep. You nailed it.
_
Derrick Peavy
Sales and Web Services
going to change anything there and the end client browser
really for the most part doesn't care.
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fennell, Mark P.
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:07 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image
e most part doesn't care.
John
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] *On
Behalf Of *Fennell, Mark P.
*Sent:* Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:07 PM
*To:* discussion@acfug.org
*Subject:* RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from
't care.
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fennell, Mark P.
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:07 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Additionally, I think HTTP 1.1 allows connection keep-alives so
that you only make o
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fennell, Mark P.
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:07 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Additionally, I think HTTP 1.1 allows connection keep-alives so that you
only make one http call for the entire page.
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Don't get me wrong, I understand it's an experiement and it's fun to try.
1. You're not actually reducing your http requests. <-- My main point with this.
3. You can save the image data in the database as a BLOB and output it onto
g.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Kindly, and with respect to everyone that replied:
1. As I stated, the goal is to reduce http requests, not file sizes. And "this
is an experiment," please forgive, but the "Why" of why I want to do this is
not part of the answer.
CTED] Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:16 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I believe there would still be three http requests here. The images would
still be called up in the html like right? Sorry but in http
that would still
f Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:16 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I believe there would still be three http requests here. The images
would still be called up in the html like right? Sorry
but in http that would still create seper
mf
-Original Message-
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *John Mason
*Sent:* Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:16 AM
*To:* discussion@acfug.org
*Subject:* RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I believe there would still be three http requests here. The images would
still be
ll, Mark P.
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:22 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I'm just curious. What are the benefits of storing the image in the db
rather than storing the file on the filesystem and the path in the db? I
mean, for a web page, all
"Consider it an experiment - I know that it may seem a bit silly."
"Fennell, Mark P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/18/2007 10:21 AM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
esn't display images
with such ease, but for a web app...? Thanks.
mf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:16 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I believe t
I believe there would still be three http requests here. The images would
still be called up in the html like right? Sorry but in http
that would still create seperate http requests.
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Pea
And the point of doing this is?
You wouldn't be saving any real bandwidth by doing it in a single request.
The size of the data is the size of the data, regardless of the number of
requests. You'd just be saving requests.
Shawn Gorrell
Web Development Applications Architect
Federal Reserve B
26 matches
Mail list logo
