RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Robert Reil
, 2006 1:18 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Is it Robertday (er, Friday) already? ;-) - dhs On August 29, 2006, Robert Reil wrote: > In the past thread termination (in SeeFusion) seems to take about 5 minutes > to recover from. > > &g

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Cody Wehunt
, August 29, 2006 1:03 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX   In the past thread termination (in SeeFusion) seems to take about 5 minutes to recover from.   I guess I could do a stack trace if someone told me what and how to do it.   Robert P. Reil

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Robert Reil
torcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw , Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JR

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Shawn . Gorrell
ussion@acfug.org To discussion@acfug.org cc Subject RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX In the past thread termination (in SeeFusion) seems to take about 5 minutes to recover from.   I guess I could do a stack trace if someone told me what and how to do it.   Robert P. Reil Ma

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Dean H. Saxe
gt; > > _ > > From: Steve Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:21 AM > To: discussion@acfug.org > Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX > > > > More importantly, what pages does SeeFusion note as running

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Robert Reil
@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX   SeeFusion recommended reducing the thread count by 80%?  That would choke most application servers I know. Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Robert Reil
Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Steve Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:21 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX   More importantly, what pages does SeeFusion note as

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Teddy Payne
It depends on the power of the box to handle the performance of each thread.  If the requests are heavy every time, more power by reducing threads is indeed a band-aid.  What Doug was alluding to was that the pages need to be fixed and not the thread count. Teddy

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Douglas Knudsen
lk NW Kennesaw , Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX   Umm, why would you reduce

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Steve Drucker
discussion@acfug.orgSubject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Well using SeeFusion showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP TIME! What was more important?   4 hours between 1-2 minute lock ups, or 2 hours between 40 minute lock ups?   I think I did the only log

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Teddy Payne
SeeFusion recommended reducing the thread count by 80%?  That would choke most application servers I know.Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http:

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Robert Reil
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX   Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom.  You have a queue of requests and the

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX

2006-08-29 Thread Teddy Payne
Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom.  You have a queue of requests and the threads are the ones that handle all of the requests.   If you have 100 requests and 10 threads handle them, that is faster than 100 requests and 2