, 2006 1:18 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Is it Robertday (er, Friday) already? ;-)
-
dhs
On August 29, 2006, Robert Reil wrote:
> In the past thread termination (in SeeFusion) seems to take about 5
minutes
> to recover from.
>
>
&g
, August 29, 2006
1:03 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
In the past thread termination (in
SeeFusion) seems to take about 5 minutes to recover from.
I guess I could do a stack trace if
someone told me what and how to do it.
Robert P. Reil
torcyclecarbs.com, Inc.
4292 Country Garden
Walk NW
Kennesaw , Ga. 30152
Office 770-974-8851
Fax 770-974-8852
www.motorcyclecarbs.com
From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006
10:41 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JR
ussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
In the past thread termination
(in SeeFusion) seems to take about 5 minutes to recover from.
I guess I could do a stack
trace if someone told me what and how to do it.
Robert P. Reil
Ma
gt;
>
> _
>
> From: Steve Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:21 AM
> To: discussion@acfug.org
> Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
>
>
>
> More importantly, what pages does SeeFusion note as running
@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
SeeFusion recommended reducing the thread count by 80%? That
would choke most application servers I know.
Teddy
-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile
Office 770-974-8851
Fax 770-974-8852
www.motorcyclecarbs.com
From: Steve Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006
11:21 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
More importantly, what pages does
SeeFusion note as
It depends on the power of the box to handle the performance of each thread. If the requests are heavy every time, more power by reducing threads is indeed a band-aid. What Doug was alluding to was that the pages need to be fixed and not the thread count.
Teddy
lk NW
Kennesaw
,
Ga. 30152
Office 770-974-8851
Fax 770-974-8852
www.motorcyclecarbs.com
From: Teddy Payne
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006
10:41 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Umm, why would you reduce
discussion@acfug.orgSubject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Well using SeeFusion
showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP
TIME!
What was more
important?
4 hours between 1-2
minute lock ups, or
2 hours between 40
minute lock ups?
I think I did the only
log
SeeFusion recommended reducing the thread count by 80%? That would choke most application servers I know.Teddy
-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
For more info, see http:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006
10:41 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE:
JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available
channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests
and the
Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests and the threads are the ones that handle all of the requests. If you have 100 requests and 10 threads handle them, that is faster than 100 requests and 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
