-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 07/03/2014 01:08, chris burnat a écrit :
> Many thanks Shad!
+1 for Shad :) and for Tony who starts the topic
Like jester i will be interested by the server count of each version
of SME Server.
Again...Many thanks Shad.
- --
Cordialement
Sté
Marco
That is good news. I'll update the Wiki with instructions on how people
can load your files and execute them.
I'll also start thinking about a schedule of tests we can run (and I'll
try and implement some of them!).
On 07/03/14 05:02, Marco Hess wrote:
On 07/03/14 04:19, Ian Wells
* Mitel handed over the e-smith forums and documentation to the community
* At that time Jeff Coleman registered the domain name contribs.org and
received all assests from Mitel on behalf of the community
* I myself maintained contribs.org for several years, working with Jeff
* Jeff eventually tr
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote:
> * Mitel handed over the e-smith forums and documentation to the community
> * At that time Jeff Coleman registered the domain name contribs.org and
The chronology isn't quite right here. The contribs.org domain name was
registered 12 months previous t
Correct, contribs.org at the time was the only 'organized entity' (as
per remark from Charlie below) to whom Mitel was able to 'hand over'
Currently contribs.org is 'still' registered to SME Server Inc
On 7-3-2014 17:07, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote:
* M
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:02:03 +0100, John Crisp wrote:
> As we no longer have SMOLT ...
Is that correct? My server still has smolt enabled and there is a boot time
message about enabling the monthly smolt checkin. Looking at the config of
smolt it points to smolt.contribs.org.
I note the commen
On 03/08/2014 05:08 AM, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:02:03 +0100, John Crisp wrote:
As we no longer have SMOLT ...
Is that correct? My server still has smolt enabled and there is a boot time
message about enabling the monthly smolt checkin. Looking at the config of
smolt it po
On 03/08/2014 10:26 AM, chris burnat wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Smolt_retirement
It may be worth going back to this bug, there is a lot of information,
in particular from Greg and JPP. SMOLT could possibly be resurrected?
Also:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Smolt_retirement
and:
