I need quake4 UDP master server updates to try and keep the real source
port when going through NAT. The master servers use the src port that
they receive when listing your server. I noticed that pf does support
that capability through the static-port option but I do not see a way of
adding t
On 1/27/06, Adam Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need quake4 UDP master server updates to try and keep the real source
> port when going through NAT. The master servers use the src port that
> they receive when listing your server. I noticed that pf does support
> that capability through th
Bill Marquette wrote:
On 1/27/06, Adam Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need quake4 UDP master server updates to try and keep the real source
port when going through NAT. The master servers use the src port that
they receive when listing your server. I noticed that pf does support
that capa
On 1/27/06, Adam Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the direction. I found the static-port setting. Someone has
> probably already noticed the bug but the NAT listing does not display
> properly for the rule I just created(the fields are in the wrong spot in
> the table but editing th
Bill Marquette wrote:
On 1/27/06, Adam Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the direction. I found the static-port setting. Someone has
probably already noticed the bug but the NAT listing does not display
properly for the rule I just created(the fields are in the wrong spot in
the tab
On 1/27/06, Adam Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Marquette wrote:
> > On 1/27/06, Adam Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Thanks for the direction. I found the static-port setting. Someone has
> >> probably already noticed the bug but the NAT listing does not display
> >> properly fo
Bill Marquette wrote:
On 1/27/06, Adam Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Marquette wrote:
On 1/27/06, Adam Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the direction. I found the static-port setting. Someone has
probably already noticed the bug but the NAT listing does n
On 1/27/06, Adam Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had to remove the src and dst ports and use src and dst IPs with
> static-port because a pf error scrolled across the top of the pfsense web
> admin page saying that static-port does not work with port ranges. Someone
> probably should find
