Re: [pfSense-discussion] Policy Enforcement: Can pfSense beat it?

2006-10-16 Thread David W . Hess
I did a quick search on Cisco policy enforcement and apparently they have user agents available for Windows and Linux systems. You say Linux is exempt which could be for any number of reasons and if so, I would expect BSD to also be exempt but I would never count on consistency in policy from a co

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Intel 82559ER switch

2007-06-17 Thread David W . Hess
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 11:23:29 -0500, RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > As things stand, devices on separate ports are capable of communicating >> > with each other, but the traffic is unseen on fxp0. >> Well, this is the normal behaviour of a switch... > >Agreed - I was just more hoping it was im

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Intel 82559ER switch

2007-06-18 Thread David W . Hess
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:32:35 -0500, RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >FWIW, OpenWRT has some utils built-in to deal with these chipsets, I >just don't have it working yet - robocfg. They've deprecated it in >favor of a kernel driver, but all it does is uses a header file from >Broadcom and twiddles