On 17 Apr 2011 21:15:39 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> I know well enough that I should avoid licensing all my original
> software under the GPL or LGPL
This would be fine, but this is not quite what you do. You lead a
long-time campaign against developers knowingly using GPL.
> Fair enough, in t
Hi Mikhael,
On Sunday 17 Apr 2011 16:11:24 Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> Dear Shlomi,
>
> You are very confused here, because it seems you miss the juridical
> background. I strongly suggest you to start to learn the topic in
> depth for several years before making any further comments on it.
You ar
On 17 Apr 2011 16:52:12 +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011, Mikhael Goikhman wrote about "Re: Fwd: A Weird
> Interpretation of the GPL":
> >...
> > It is wrong thus to call this vision as "interpetation of a license".
> >
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011, Mikhael Goikhman wrote about "Re: Fwd: A Weird
Interpretation of the GPL":
>...
> It is wrong thus to call this vision as "interpetation of a license".
> Your whole argument is wrongly based and void. It is astonishing that
> you still cont
il misconfiguration. Please read it and reply.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- Shlomi Fish
>
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: A Weird Interpretation of the GPL
> Date: Friday 11 Dec 2009, 13:13:36
> From: Shlomi Fish
> To: Hamakor
> CC: Mikhael Goikhman
>
&g
Hi!
Sorry for the latish response.
On Friday 11 Dec 2009 14:38:50 Shai Berger wrote:
> On Friday 11 December 2009, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > On Friday 11 Dec 2009 14:01:11 Shai Berger wrote:
> > > Shlomi,
> > >
> > > Why do you bother those of us who are not subscribed to Linux-IL with
> > > an argu
On Friday 11 December 2009, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Friday 11 Dec 2009 14:01:11 Shai Berger wrote:
> > Shlomi,
> >
> > Why do you bother those of us who are not subscribed to Linux-IL with an
> > argument for which you have received (what appears to be) a satisfactory
> > answer in the original for
On Friday 11 Dec 2009 14:01:11 Shai Berger wrote:
> Shlomi,
>
> Why do you bother those of us who are not subscribed to Linux-IL with an
> argument for which you have received (what appears to be) a satisfactory
> answer in the original forum --
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux...@cs.huji.ac.il
Shlomi,
Why do you bother those of us who are not subscribed to Linux-IL with an
argument for which you have received (what appears to be) a satisfactory
answer in the original forum --
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux...@cs.huji.ac.il/msg57007.html ?
One thing contributing to the strength of
Hi Mikhael and all!
In the previous discussion about the FOSS Licences Wars, Migo has protected
the GPL and the LGPL claiming they were the best strong copyleft and weak
copyleft (respectively) licences , and that there was no point in phrasing
shorter, easier to understand and shorter ones.
H
10 matches
Mail list logo
