On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 12:21 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> One of the things I'd like to see out of RPM in the near future is
> actual processing of these .desktop files to generate rpm metadata,
> application (generic,specific), mime times supported, etc... That type
> of information would be very
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Since I'm more or less maintaining the spec about .desktop files, I'm
> willing to review guidelines of other distros related to this to be sure
> they're all fine :-) Just tell me where I can find the relevant document
> for your distro.
Thanks Vincent. I think our overview
Vincent Untz wrote:
>> How about consolidating common guidelines? I am sure there are atleast
>> some basic things pretty much all the distributions can follow.
>
> Would be even better, of course. I was unsure if there'd be interest for
> this
most definitely, +1 here (fedora)
-- Rex
___
Le jeudi 20 mars 2008, à 16:31 +, Jonathan Riddell a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:00:24PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > I just fixed some errors in the openSUSE packaging guidelines about
> > .desktop files. Last year, I also reported an error in the example
> > .desktop file used for
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:00:24PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> I just fixed some errors in the openSUSE packaging guidelines about
> .desktop files. Last year, I also reported an error in the example
> .desktop file used for the Fedora packaging guidelines.
Why did you change GenericName to Comme
Vincent Untz wrote:
>
> Would be even better, of course. I was unsure if there'd be interest for
> this, but this list might be a good place for such crazy ideas ;-)
Yep. Here is what I could find
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Development/Packagin
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 17:16 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
>
> I think I contacted Tom Callaway directly and he fixed it. Can't link to
> the change in the wiki since I can't access it right now.
>
> Sorry for not being clearer in my original mail :-)
Gotcha, I wasn't sure if it had been fixed yet o
Le jeudi 20 mars 2008, à 12:03 -0400, Jesse Keating a écrit :
> On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 17:00 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> >
> > I just fixed some errors in the openSUSE packaging guidelines about
> > .desktop files. Last year, I also reported an error in the example
> > .desktop file used for the F
Le jeudi 20 mars 2008, à 21:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just fixed some errors in the openSUSE packaging guidelines about
> > .desktop files. Last year, I also reported an error in the example
> > .desktop file used for the Fedora packaging guidelines
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just fixed some errors in the openSUSE packaging guidelines about
> .desktop files. Last year, I also reported an error in the example
> .desktop file used for the Fedora packaging guidelines.
>
> Since I'm more or less maintaining the spec about .desktop files, I'
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 17:00 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
>
> I just fixed some errors in the openSUSE packaging guidelines about
> .desktop files. Last year, I also reported an error in the example
> .desktop file used for the Fedora packaging guidelines.
>
> Since I'm more or less maintaining the
Hi,
I just fixed some errors in the openSUSE packaging guidelines about
.desktop files. Last year, I also reported an error in the example
.desktop file used for the Fedora packaging guidelines.
Since I'm more or less maintaining the spec about .desktop files, I'm
willing to review guidelines of
12 matches
Mail list logo
