Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since all of us distro folks have our own in-distro packaging
> guidelines, wouldn't it make sense to start meeting and discussing these
> things with other distros to try and get some conformity going on? A
> recent discussion about how to deal with jp
##distros works for me... /me adds to his autojoin list :)
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 22:11 +, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 23:01 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Fine for me, im in there now, and set it up together with madduck. And
> > will add more people when they join and request
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 23:01 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Fine for me, im in there now, and set it up together with madduck. And
> will add more people when they join and request it (and are known from
> this list :) ).
>
>
> And yes, the ## is better than a # channel, due to freenode policy.
> C
On 11337 March 1977, martin f. krafft wrote:
>> So I also vote for irc.oftc.net AKA irc.debian.org. (It also supports
>> proper SSL connections and nickserv identify using ssl certs, ... :) )
>> (Speaking as oftc staff) :)
> I think that the argument is that some of us are on freenode but not
> on
> So I also vote for irc.oftc.net AKA irc.debian.org. (It also supports
> proper SSL connections and nickserv identify using ssl certs, ... :) )
> (Speaking as oftc staff) :)
I think that the argument is that some of us are on freenode but not
on oftc, but those who are on oftc are probably also o
On 11336 March 1977, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> 17:15 < dberkholz> info #distributions
> 17:15 -ChanServ([EMAIL PROTECTED])- Channel: #Distributions
> 17:15 -ChanServ([EMAIL PROTECTED])- Contact: Aristotles
> 17:15 -ChanServ([EMAIL PROTECTED])- Registered: 1 year 25 weeks 1 day (23h
>
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 18:48:49 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> I would really not rather sit on yet another IRC network, lets keep this
> on freenode please.
+1
--
Will Stephenson
Desktop Engineer
KDE Team
___
Distributions mailing list
Distributions
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 18:30 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.26.1828 +0100]:
> > I don't mind either way, does anyone have a strong preference either
> > way?
>
> #distros / irc.oftc.net
I would really not rather sit on yet another IRC network,
also sprach James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.26.1828 +0100]:
> I don't mind either way, does anyone have a strong preference either
> way?
#distros / irc.oftc.net
*very strong* :)
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"my father, a good man, told me:
'never lose yo
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:17 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 16:47 Wed 26 Mar , James Westby wrote:
> > I think IRC meetings would be a good next step.
> >
> > I had a look on freenode, and #distributions is taken,
> > #distributions-devel is not, would that be unacceptable to anyone?
>
>
On 16:47 Wed 26 Mar , James Westby wrote:
> I think IRC meetings would be a good next step.
>
> I had a look on freenode, and #distributions is taken,
> #distributions-devel is not, would that be unacceptable to anyone?
Freenode staff will hand over channels that are unused if there's a
pro
also sprach James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.26.1747 +0100]:
> I had a look on freenode, and #distributions is taken,
> #distributions-devel is not, would that be unacceptable to anyone?
oftc is generally a better network, I found... but I don't care.
> Shall we set a date for a first m
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:47 +, James Westby wrote:
>
> I think IRC meetings would be a good next step.
>
> I had a look on freenode, and #distributions is taken,
> #distributions-devel is not, would that be unacceptable to anyone?
worksforme
>
> Shall we set a date for a first meeting? I'
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:18 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:10 -0400, Ken VanDine wrote:
> > That definately makes sense. What kind of forum? More than just
> > threads on the mailing list? Should we maybe have an irc channel?
> > Perhaps do regulary irc or phone conferenc
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:08 PM, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.26.1704 +0100]:
>
> > Since all of us distro folks have our own in-distro packaging
> > guidelines, wouldn't it make sense to start meeting and discussing these
>
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:10 -0400, Ken VanDine wrote:
> That definately makes sense. What kind of forum? More than just
> threads on the mailing list? Should we maybe have an irc channel?
> Perhaps do regulary irc or phone conferences?
This list could be a coordination point for semi-regular
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.26.1704 +0100]:
>> Since all of us distro folks have our own in-distro packaging
>> guidelines, wouldn't it make sense to start meeting and discussing these
>> things with other distros to try and get some conformity go
That definately makes sense. What kind of forum? More than just
threads on the mailing list? Should we maybe have an irc channel?
Perhaps do regulary irc or phone conferences?
--Ken
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:04 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Since all of us distro folks have our own in-distro
also sprach Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.26.1704 +0100]:
> Since all of us distro folks have our own in-distro packaging
> guidelines, wouldn't it make sense to start meeting and discussing these
> things with other distros to try and get some conformity going on?
What exactly would
19 matches
Mail list logo
