Re: [Distutils] setuptools pain

2007-12-28 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Dec 28, 2007, at 2:42 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 01:49 PM 12/28/2007 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> Would it be possible to just print the traceback? > > You can set the DISTUTILS_DEBUG environment variable to get > tracebacks from distutils o

Re: [Distutils] setuptools pain

2007-12-28 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 01:49 PM 12/28/2007 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: >Would it be possible to just print the traceback? You can set the DISTUTILS_DEBUG environment variable to get tracebacks from distutils or setuptools. >This is the MacPorts version of Python, so I guess I have to shame >them for busting setuptoo

Re: [Distutils] Forcing setuptools options (always unzip, no dependencies) in buildout?

2007-12-28 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 07:30 AM 12/28/2007 -0700, Jeff Shell wrote: >I still can't get a Egg based Zope app/site up and running. The last >headache that I ran into before I had to focus on other work was a >core Zope egg (zope.filerepresentation, which we use quite heavily) >being a Zipfile based egg. In this mode, Zo

Re: [Distutils] setuptools pain

2007-12-28 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Phillip, thanks for the response. On Dec 25, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 05:51 PM 12/23/2007 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> setuptools is causing me pain lately. Something's

Re: [Distutils] easy_install of django sdist tarball omits data files

2007-12-28 Thread zooko
On Dec 23, 2007, at 10:27 PM, Matt Good wrote: > Sigh. From what I read of their complaints they could have all been > fixed with a 2-line diff to remove ez_setup from setup.py. ... > If you care about Django setuptools support you should > follow up to make sure they realize that they can use

Re: [Distutils] Buildout plans (Re: Setuptools plans?)

2007-12-28 Thread Jeff Shell
On Dec 28, 2007 8:43 AM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Jeff Shell wrote: > > Same thing goes for buildout: any roadmap or plans? > > I consider buildout to be pretty mature at this point. I have no plans > for major changes. There are a number of small thing

Re: [Distutils] Forcing setuptools options (always unzip, no dependencies) in buildout?

2007-12-28 Thread Jeff Shell
On Dec 28, 2007 8:40 AM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Jeff Shell wrote: > > I still can't get a Egg based Zope app/site up and running. > > That's amazing. I think that some of the problem stems from us using a lot of core Zope 3 bits, and we have to take on

Re: [Distutils] enhancing .pypirc file for multiple servers handling

2007-12-28 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Hello, I have create a "iw.dist" package that implements two distutils commands: - mregister - mupload They allow to register and upload packages on several PyPI-like servers, with an ehnanced version of .pypirc (compatible with the old version) For example this .pypirc file adds a new server:

[Distutils] Setuptools plans?

2007-12-28 Thread Jeff Shell
First: why 0.6c7? Can't we just have a 0.6.0 release? what's holding that back? That version number just seems doubly immature (sub-1.0 and "release candidate") and I often wonder what little push is needed to have a normal 0.6 release. Is there a roadmap or general plans for setuptools for the co

[Distutils] Forcing setuptools options (always unzip, no dependencies) in buildout?

2007-12-28 Thread Jeff Shell
I still can't get a Egg based Zope app/site up and running. The last headache that I ran into before I had to focus on other work was a core Zope egg (zope.filerepresentation, which we use quite heavily) being a Zipfile based egg. In this mode, Zope's configuration machinery can't get config files