[Distutils] setuptools: zip_safe as command line option ?

2010-12-08 Thread Martin Raspaud
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Is it possible to tell setuptools to not zip the egg when installing ? I can't seem to find any option regarding this in the command line help... Thanks, Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG

Re: [Distutils] zc.buildout fails to use system-installed dep?

2010-12-08 Thread Reinout van Rees
On 12/05/2010 11:14 PM, Alan Franzoni wrote: I've verified this happens all the times on Ubuntu 10.10, both 32 and 64 bit. I don't know if it's Ubuntu's or zc.buildout's fault; I've opened a ticket. I have the same problem on ubuntu. I never managed to find out what the real reason is, but my

Re: [Distutils] zc.buildout fails to use system-installed dep?

2010-12-08 Thread Alan Franzoni
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Reinout van Rees wrote: > I have the same problem on ubuntu.  I never managed to find out what the > real reason is, but my guess is that it's ubuntu's way of installing python > packages for multiple python versions. I have filed a ticket on zc.buildout bugtracke

Re: [Distutils] setuptools: zip_safe as command line option ?

2010-12-08 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:52:15AM +0100, Martin Raspaud wrote: > Is it possible to tell setuptools to not zip the egg when installing ? I can't > seem to find any option regarding this in the command line help... Setuptools has no command-line. If you mean easy_install, it's -Z (--always-unzip).

Re: [Distutils] setuptools: zip_safe as command line option ?

2010-12-08 Thread Benji York
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote: > I believe there's a config file to tell setuptools to never zip eggs; I > don't remember the specifics.  Have you tried google? In distutils.cfg: [easy_install] zip_ok = 0 -- Benji York ___ Di

Re: [Distutils] zc.buildout fails to use system-installed dep?

2010-12-08 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:21:55PM +0100, Reinout van Rees wrote: > On 12/05/2010 11:14 PM, Alan Franzoni wrote: > >I've verified this happens all the times on Ubuntu 10.10, both 32 and > >64 bit. I don't know if it's Ubuntu's or zc.buildout's fault; I've > >opened a ticket. > > I have the same pr

Re: [Distutils] zc.buildout fails to use system-installed dep?

2010-12-08 Thread Barry Warsaw
To start with, the Debian/Ubuntu arrangement is made even more confusing for there being three competing "build systems" for Python. There are the traditional python-central and python-support systems, which most packages these days use. python-support is probably more popular than python-central

Re: [Distutils] setuptools: zip_safe as command line option ?

2010-12-08 Thread Martin Raspaud
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 2010-12-08 17:34, Marius Gedminas skrev: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:52:15AM +0100, Martin Raspaud wrote: >> Is it possible to tell setuptools to not zip the egg when installing ? I >> can't >> seem to find any option regarding this in the command li

Re: [Distutils] setuptools: zip_safe as command line option ?

2010-12-08 Thread P.J. Eby
At 08:54 PM 12/8/2010 +0100, Martin Raspaud wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 2010-12-08 17:34, Marius Gedminas skrev: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:52:15AM +0100, Martin Raspaud wrote: >> Is it possible to tell setuptools to not zip the egg when installing ? I can't >> seem

Re: [Distutils] zc.buildout fails to use system-installed dep?

2010-12-08 Thread Alan Franzoni
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Why do we have symlinks in the first place?  It's because Debian and Ubuntu > support multiple active versions of Python at the same time.  Once Python 2 is > killed off and we're all using >= Python 3.2, we can get rid of even this > cruft.  T

Re: [Distutils] zc.buildout fails to use system-installed dep?

2010-12-08 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Dec 09, 2010, at 12:35 AM, Alan Franzoni wrote: >On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> Why do we have symlinks in the first place?  It's because Debian and Ubuntu >> support multiple active versions of Python at the same time.  Once Python 2 >> is >> killed off and we're all