I've started a list wh...@librelist.com to discuss the implementation
of the 'wheel' binary package format, instead of discussing it all on
this list. Mail the list to join. We are hoping to have support merged
into pip soon.
Daniel H
___
Distutils-SIG m
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Antonio Cavallo wrote:
> Here few lesson learnt using rpm and python at fairly large scale
> (http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/cavallo71:/opt-python-interpreters)
> project of mine I wish could be of some help in thinking of a "packaging
> system"
I've now updated distlib to include equivalent functionality for pkg_resources'
entry points. There is no ability to install packages on-demand via "require()"
functionality, but distributions are able to register things they implement,
and the capability to query what's available is also present.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> I've now updated distlib to include equivalent functionality for
> pkg_resources'
> entry points. There is no ability to install packages on-demand via
> "require()"
> functionality, but distributions are able to register things they implement
Also, I've started mirroring distribute at github and running the tests
using travis-ci (https://travis-ci.org/#!/jaraco/distribute).
I haven't looked into why the tests are currently failing. They were passing
at one point, though they seem to fail intermittently.
> -Original Message-
>
Because when travis build farm is overloaded, and hence it cannot
launch a testing environment, it says your tests failed.
Le 8 oct. 2012 à 20:05, "Jason R. Coombs" a
écrit :
Also, I've started mirroring distribute at github and running the
tests
using travis-ci (https://travis-ci.or
PJ Eby telecommunity.com> writes:
>
> Given that it's the same format, is there any reason to change the
> filename? Changing the filename just means more code in Daniel's
> wheel support code,
I'm not too hung up about the filename, and only chose REGISTRY because it is
more aligned with the
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Registry of what ever you like - pointers to data, perhaps. Any use of the
> registry, just like entry points, is a matter of convention between consenting
> / cooperating developers and their applications/libraries, or am I missing
> something?
Lennart Regebro gmail.com> writes:
>> IIUC, you're allowed to just define a module or package without the
>> attributes appearing after the ":"
>
> Right, but isn't that then an entry point?
>
How is it an entry point? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what an entry point is,
but to my mind it's th
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>> Registry of what ever you like - pointers to data, perhaps. Any use of the
>> registry, just like entry points, is a matter of convention between
>> consenting
>> / cooperating develope
Daniel Holth gmail.com> writes:
> I would prefer to keep the filename the same as long as the format is
> the same.
See my comments about read_registry and write_registry methods in Distribution
(in response to Lennart's post).
> In other words, it is a hassle and the feature is the same. An
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
