Why the jump from 1.5.6 to 6.0?
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
tshep...@gmail.com wrote:
Why the jump from 1.5.6 to 6.0?
The release notes say (under 6.0):
PROCESS Version numbers are now simply X.Y where the leading 1 has
been dropped.
(from https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/news.html )
I'm guessing
On Dec 23, 2014, at 1:23 AM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
In particular, , , ~=, and, when using a .*, the != and == use the number
of dots in the given specifier to indicate the precision of the specifier.
the PEP text is pretty clear on the precision concept for ~= and when
On Dec 23, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
oh, A compatible release clause consists of either a version identifier
without any comparison operator or else the compatible release operator ~=
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com
On 23 Dec 2014 19:02, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 23, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
oh, A compatible release clause consists of either a version identifier
without any comparison operator or else the compatible release operator ~=
On Mon, Dec 22,
Well you know my preferences is for github ;). I don't mind much either way
though since its a simple repo I rarely need to interact with. The main benefit
would be consistency with most of the other pypa things.
I'm +1 on adding a bug tracker link. Maybe peps should support a header for it
On Dec 22, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Vladimir Diaz vladimir.v.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 December 2014 at 01:46, Vladimir Diaz vladimir.v.d...@gmail.com
mailto:vladimir.v.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I just started using stdeb but have run into a problem which I can't solve.
Just for background, so you know at what level to aim replies, I'm a long-time
programmer, over 30 years in fact. I make much of what I do available to
others but I've only just got around to packaging, so I know
Yes but thanks to Marc it now provides a clear message as to why.
(Sent from my mobile)
On Dec 23, 2014 11:22 AM, James Bennett ubernost...@gmail.com wrote:
So, if PyPI has foo-1.7 and foo-1.7.1, does 1.7 just fail to find
anything installable?
___
On 22 December 2014 at 20:44, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
it would fail. you'd need 1.7.0
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:36 PM, James Bennett ubernost...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, if PyPI has foo-1.7 and foo-1.7.1, does 1.7 just fail to find
anything installable?
I think the thing I'd
Hi folks,
I'm trying to package up a complex system and would like to do it the
correct, modern way.
In particular, this involves a bunch of compiled extensions, as well as
dependencies on both the scientific stack and common Web app packages.
(can you tell I'm building a web service front-end
It also provides consistency with date-based versions. And versions aren't
decimals so thinking of them like that is not exactly useful.
On Dec 23, 2014 11:43 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 December 2014 at 20:44, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
it would fail. you'd need
On Dec 23, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to package up a complex system and would like to do it the
correct, modern way.
In particular, this involves a bunch of compiled extensions, as well as
dependencies on both the scientific
On 23 Dec 2014, at 18:43, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 December 2014 at 20:44, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
it would fail. you'd need 1.7.0
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:36 PM, James Bennett ubernost...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, if PyPI has foo-1.7 and foo-1.7.1, does
git+https://url_to_the_repo.git#egg=name_of_package
why isn't that wheel=name_of_package
the egg part here has nothing to do with eggs. just a vestige of another
time.
see https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/1265
and will it work if setuptools was not used in the packages setup.py???
yes,
just post edit suggestions here?
https://bitbucket.org/pypa/pypi-metadata-formats is not up to date anymore
some other location?
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 23, 2014, at 1:23 AM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
In particular, , , ~=,
Heh, that’s actually a hold over from before we made specifiers mandatory.
That needs updated.
you mean made operators mandatory?
so the bit about version identifier without any comparison operator needs
to be removed?
---
Donald Stufft
PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372
17 matches
Mail list logo
