On 2 February 2015 at 03:04, Marcus Smith wrote:
>
>> I agree that from an implementation perspective, this could just be a
>> new recommended URL in the project URLs metadata (e.g. "Reference
>> Container Images"). If folks don't think the idea sounds horrible,
>> I'll make that update to the PEP
> I agree that from an implementation perspective, this could just be a
> new recommended URL in the project URLs metadata (e.g. "Reference
> Container Images"). If folks don't think the idea sounds horrible,
> I'll make that update to the PEP 459 draft.
>
wouldn't this just be a use case for a cu
