[adding list back on CC]
On 22.04.2015 16:11, Christoph Schmitt wrote:
Am 2015-04-22 12:59, schrieb M.-A. Lemburg:
On 22.04.2015 12:38, Robert Collins wrote:
On 22 April 2015 at 22:13, Christoph Schmitt dev-maili...@gongy.de wrote:
Hello again,
since I haven't got any replies yet I'm trying
On 23 April 2015 at 03:09, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
[adding list back on CC]
On 22.04.2015 16:11, Christoph Schmitt wrote:
Am 2015-04-22 12:59, schrieb M.-A. Lemburg:
On 22.04.2015 12:38, Robert Collins wrote:
That would apply also if namespace_packages would be ignored
On 22.04.2015 21:08, Robert Collins wrote:
On 23 April 2015 at 03:09, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
[adding list back on CC]
On 22.04.2015 16:11, Christoph Schmitt wrote:
Am 2015-04-22 12:59, schrieb M.-A. Lemburg:
On 22.04.2015 12:38, Robert Collins wrote:
That would apply also
A note from the peanut gallery:
I like the idea of namepace packages, but every time I've tried to use
them, I've been stymied -- maybe this PEP will solve that, but...
First - the issues:
- It somehow seems like a lot of work, details to get right, and
more-than-one-way-to-do-it. But maybe
On Apr 22, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
A note from the peanut gallery:
I like the idea of namepace packages, but every time I've tried to use them,
I've been stymied -- maybe this PEP will solve that, but...
First - the issues:
- It somehow seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/22/2015 08:31 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Apr 22, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov
mailto:chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
A note from the peanut gallery:
I like the idea of namepace packages, but every time I've
On 23 April 2015 at 08:16, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote:
On 04/22/2015 03:25 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 22.04.2015 21:08, Robert Collins wrote:
So - pip would have to a) detect both styles of package, b)
automatically install all installed-but-wrong-style versions to match
the site
On 23 April 2015 at 07:25, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 22.04.2015 21:08, Robert Collins wrote:
I don't think support mixed setups is really a practical option.
Either the namespace package is legacy all the way, or it
isn't and uses PEP 420.
Wouldn't it be possible for
On Apr 23, 2015, at 07:08 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
PEP-420 and legacy packages being mixed for one namespace doesn't work at all
today - in principle fixable via changes to both setuptools and importlib -
but it was about here that the other openstack folk said 'ok wow, lets just
stop using
On 04/22/2015 03:25 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 22.04.2015 21:08, Robert Collins wrote:
So - pip would have to a) detect both styles of package, b)
automatically install all installed-but-wrong-style versions to match
the site installed ones. And if any of the packages in the namespace
only
Hello again,
since I haven't got any replies yet I'm trying to make myself a bit more
precise now. I consider the behaviour described in my original posting a
bug. I posted to this list because the setuptools docs say Please use
the distutils-sig mailing list [3] for questions and discussion
On 22 April 2015 at 22:13, Christoph Schmitt dev-maili...@gongy.de wrote:
Hello again,
since I haven't got any replies yet I'm trying to make myself a bit more
precise now. I consider the behaviour described in my original posting a
bug. I posted to this list because the setuptools docs say
On 22.04.2015 12:38, Robert Collins wrote:
On 22 April 2015 at 22:13, Christoph Schmitt dev-maili...@gongy.de wrote:
Hello again,
since I haven't got any replies yet I'm trying to make myself a bit more
precise now. I consider the behaviour described in my original posting a
bug. I posted to
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:55 AM Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Just thought I'd share this since it shows how what people are using to
download things from PyPI have changed over the past year. Of particular
interest to most people will be the final graphs showing what percentage of
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 22 April 2015 at 22:13, Christoph Schmitt dev-maili...@gongy.de
wrote:
Hello again,
since I haven't got any replies yet I'm trying to make myself a bit more
precise now. I consider the behaviour
15 matches
Mail list logo
