On Sun, Jul 8, 2018, 08:40 Pradyun Gedam, wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, 13:03 Nick Coghlan, wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Some time ago, we adjusted the distutils-sig PEP approval process to
>> include a "Provisional" status, where we approved changes for
>> inclusion in the reference
On 8 July 2018 at 15:41, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018, 04:25 Paul Moore wrote:
>>
>>
>> In principle, I'm 100% on board with this. However, as is typical with
>> packaging changes, we have a huge backward compatibility situation to
>> address - the many packages on PyPI that are
On 2018-07-08 10:31:04 -0700 (-0700), Nathaniel Smith wrote:
[...]
> Unless I'm missing something, that's unrelated :-). The "build
> isolation" we're talking about here is a new feature where pip
> tries to use a clean python environment for the build, and that
> issue is about an old feature
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, 13:03 Nick Coghlan, wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Some time ago, we adjusted the distutils-sig PEP approval process to
> include a "Provisional" status, where we approved changes for
> inclusion in the reference implementations (typically pip and
> setuptools), but still reserved
On 2018-07-08 07:41:43 -0700 (-0700), Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018, 04:25 Paul Moore wrote:
[...]
> > I'd like to find some way of assessing the impact before we
> > simply switch to full build isolation (we've already had a fair
> > number of bug reports on pip that are triggered
On 8 July 2018 at 04:42, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
(I'm going to read your full mail in more detail before commenting,
but I wanted to pick out this point immediately, as I think it's
worthwhile addressing it in particular)
> If there's some reason we *don't* plan to eventually make
>
Hi folks,
Some time ago, we adjusted the distutils-sig PEP approval process to
include a "Provisional" status, where we approved changes for
inclusion in the reference implementations (typically pip and
setuptools), but still reserved the right to make adjustments if
practical experience showed
To echo Nathaniel, thanks Nick; in the time I've been on this list, I
think you've done an impressive job of moderating discussions, ensuring
we can reach consensuses and move forwards. And thanks Paul for stepping
up to fill this role. :-)
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018, at 4:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
