[Distutils] Strange warnings from package_index?

Hello, A user of one of my packages came to me the other day with a strange problem that I've never seen before, and have thus far been unable to reproduce. I was wondering if anyone here had any idea about it. When he runs setup.py build on my package, it immediately outputs: $ python setup.py

Re: [Distutils] distutils2 1.0a4 and simple package

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: >> Thanks for the pointer, is there anyway to use another filename other >> than setup.cfg? >> I am trying to build several related package from a common root? > In the current code the filename must be setup.cfg.  I think the rise of > distribu

Re: [Distutils] Installation

Hi Vikash, On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:02 AM, vikash agrawal wrote: > Ok, I will try installing it tonight from tarek's, and will let you know. > Also some time ago, I was trying to package it for Fedora 16 and I faced > similar problem with that, pysetup not getting installed. > > Also @tarek, if p

Re: [Distutils] Installation

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, vikash agrawal wrote: > hi Everyone, > > I am using Python 2.7, so how do I install pysetup. though when I install > distutils1.0a3 I do see distutils module in my interactive session but I > dont see any pysetup being installed That "release" is pretty old, and I

Re: [Distutils] Distribute instead of setuptools for virtualenv?

2012/1/16 Lennart Regebro : > 2012/1/16 Christian Ştefănescu : >> Also, if this works just fine, wouldn't it make sense to make Distribute the >> default for virtualenv at some point? > > In my opinion, yes. FWIW you can also set VIRTUALENV_USE_DISTRIBUTE=1 in your environment. Or, in the latest

[Distutils] why does easy_install set +x on all .py files?

Hi all, I've used setuptools for a long time, and yet I've only just noticed this behavior. It came up because I wanted nose to run some installed tests, and it was mysterious as to why it wasn't finding them. Debug output from nose revealed the answer: it was skipping searching those modules be

Re: [Distutils] distribute's sandboxing doesn't preserve working_set; leads to setup_requires problems

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Erik Bray wrote: > Hello all, > I've got a tricky problem I'm trying to deal with.  Here's the scenario: > > I'm trying to build a package that has two requirements in > setup_requires; let's say `setup_requires = ['

[Distutils] distribute's sandboxing doesn't preserve working_set; leads to setup_requires problems

Hello all, I've got a tricky problem I'm trying to deal with. Here's the scenario: I'm trying to build a package that has two requirements in setup_requires; let's say `setup_requires = ['package_A', 'package_B']`. The problem is that "package_B" also contains "package_A" in its own setup_require

Re: [Distutils] distutils2 Forward Compatibility module

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote: > Hi Erik, > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Erik Bray wrote: >> Hi all, >> This is my first post specifically to distutils-sig, though I've had >> an interest in packaging for a while (having come up with

[Distutils] distutils2 Forward Compatibility module

Hi all, This is my first post specifically to distutils-sig, though I've had an interest in packaging for a while (having come up with some fairly arcane schemes in the past, where no better alternatives were apparent). At any rate: I'm currently working on a plan to overhaul how a number of my co

<    1   2