anatoly techtonik wrote:
So, there won't be any package management tool shipped with Python 2.7
and users will have to download and install `setuptools` manually as
before:
search - download - unzip - cmd - cd - python
setup.py install
Therefore I still propose shipping bootstrap package
On 29 March 2010 10:38, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
I still think you should remove python-dev from the cc list ;)
I don't know what happened with the change of subject and
crossposting, but I'm now seeing 2 copies of every mail, and both
copies are appearing in both python-dev and
anatoly techtonik wrote:
So, there won't be any package management tool shipped with Python 2.7
and users will have to download and install `setuptools` manually as
before:
Until the discussed package management tools support a robust inventory
and uninstallation system that plays well with
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
I still think you should remove python-dev from the cc list ;)
I don't know what happened with the change of subject and
crossposting, but I'm now seeing 2 copies of every mail, and both
copies are appearing in both
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 16:21, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a thought about user story my customers would likely write if I
shipped Python as a product:
As a user, I think Python is suxx, because it makes its users suffer
for a long time from packaging disorder.
So fix
2010/3/29 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
anatoly techtonik wrote:
So, there won't be any package management tool shipped with Python 2.7
and users will have to download and install `setuptools` manually as
before:
Until the discussed package management tools support a robust inventory
and
