Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-13 Thread Bruno Alexandre Rosa
Message- From: Nathaniel Smith [mailto:n...@pobox.com] Sent: sábado, 8 de abril de 2017 03:45 To: Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> Cc: Bruno Alexandre Rosa <bruno.r...@eldorado.org.br>; distutils sig <distutils-sig@python.org> Subject: Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, im

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-08 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 7 April 2017 at 06:32, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:37 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >>> And as it turns out, not only are we able to get bare metal machines >>> to

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-07 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 7 April 2017 at 06:32, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:37 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> And as it turns out, not only are we able to get bare metal machines >> to run our VMs on (rather than messing about with nested virt >> support), but the

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-06 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:37 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 5 April 2017 at 15:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >>> It may also be worth getting in touch with the CentOS CI folks about >>>

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-06 Thread Bruno Alexandre Rosa
Smith <n...@pobox.com> Cc: Bruno Alexandre Rosa <bruno.r...@eldorado.org.br>; distutils sig <distutils-sig@python.org> Subject: Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1? On 5 April 2017 at 15:59, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-05 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 5 April 2017 at 15:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> It may also be worth getting in touch with the CentOS CI folks about >> those aspects: https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI/GettingStarted > > That page

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-05 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 5 April 2017 at 11:12, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Bruno Alexandre Rosa >> wrote: >>> We would be very glad to help adding ppc support for

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-04 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 5 April 2017 at 11:12, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Bruno Alexandre Rosa > wrote: >> We would be very glad to help adding ppc support for manylinux3 :) > > I guess if we're going ahead and doing manylinux3 now, then we

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-04 Thread Nathaniel Smith
SIG > [mailto:distutils-sig-bounces+bruno.rosa=eldorado.org...@python.org] On > Behalf Of Nathaniel Smith > Sent: segunda-feira, 3 de abril de 2017 19:34 > To: Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> > Cc: distutils sig <distutils-sig@python.org> > Subject: Re: [Distutils] C

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-04 Thread Bruno Alexandre Rosa
Stufft <don...@stufft.io> Cc: distutils sig <distutils-sig@python.org> Subject: Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1? On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> w

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-03 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: >> CentOS5 is EOL now and the repositories have been taken offline. Does this >> impact manylinux1? Do we need to work on a manylinux2? > > Ugh, if we

Re: [Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-03 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > CentOS5 is EOL now and the repositories have been taken offline. Does this > impact manylinux1? Do we need to work on a manylinux2? Ugh, if we don't have access to the repositories then the existing manylinux1 docker images

[Distutils] CentOS5 is EOL, impact on manylinux1?

2017-04-03 Thread Donald Stufft
CentOS5 is EOL now and the repositories have been taken offline. Does this impact manylinux1? Do we need to work on a manylinux2? — Donald Stufft ___ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org