On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
If people don’t like the requirements of Apache License 2.0 that’s fine they
don’t need to contribute. Perhaps there might be a contributor or two lost
to that but I’m not too worried about it.
License is a bike shed
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:00:59AM -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
As I said, running a local copy of PostgreSQLis very easy. There are
installers for Windows and OSX, and pretty much every *nix
distribution will have it packaged.
My ex-coworker Ignas came up with a Makefile snippet that sets up a
On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:00 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
First things first, thanks for the detailed response.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
First some background questions:
1. Everything for core development is in HG. Why Git now?
First things first, thanks for the detailed response.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
First some background questions:
1. Everything for core development is in HG. Why Git now? Why
Mercurial suxx (three major personal annoyances will do)? Why
BitBucket
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Oct 31, 2013, at 7:32 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
Why I am skeptical that new site will replace old one soon? Just
because I don't believe in rewrites by one man army. When you develop
public
On Nov 8, 2013, at 7:21 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
First some background questions:
1. Everything for core development is in HG. Why Git now? Why
Mercurial suxx (three major personal annoyances will do)? Why
BitBucket suxx?
I’m most familiar with git, so I used git
