Re: [Distutils] Warehouse Migration Plan

2013-07-31 Thread Paul Moore
On 31 July 2013 05:15, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote: [...] +1. This sounds like a good plan I do not want a packaging index server to be specified by implementation, so as the legacy API is ported over to Warehouse a specification will be drafted. This spec will represent the promise

Re: [Distutils] Warehouse Migration Plan

2013-07-31 Thread holger krekel
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 00:15 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote: So, in the spirit of not treating distutils-sig like an adversary, here's the main thing I've been working on lately with regards to PyPI. None of this is set in stone but this is the general gist of the plan for moving things to be

Re: [Distutils] Warehouse Migration Plan

2013-07-31 Thread Donald Stufft
On Jul 31, 2013, at 8:11 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 00:15 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote: So, in the spirit of not treating distutils-sig like an adversary, here's the main thing I've been working on lately with regards to PyPI. None of this is set in

[Distutils] Warehouse Migration Plan

2013-07-30 Thread Donald Stufft
So, in the spirit of not treating distutils-sig like an adversary, here's the main thing I've been working on lately with regards to PyPI. None of this is set in stone but this is the general gist of the plan for moving things to be developed in a modern framework, as well as cleaning up the code