On 8/30/21 3:36 PM, sebb wrote:
If the analyses are to be useful, *all* the flagged words and phrases
need to be linked to potential replacements.
Very few are listed on the INI word list [1].
I'll try to put together a page while I wait for the INI folks to decide
what to put on their lis
On 8/30/21 4:09 PM, sebb wrote:
On the other hand, if the answer is "step back a bit, think about what
you were trying to communicate, and don't use lame or retarded in the
sentence", then it's a different mindset entirely. Not easier. Just
different.
I have given it some thought, and have no
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 20:46, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/30/21 3:36 PM, sebb wrote:
> > If the analyses are to be useful, *all* the flagged words and phrases
> > need to be linked to potential replacements.
> >
> > Very few are listed on the INI word list [1].
> >
> > The following need sugges
On 8/30/21 3:36 PM, sebb wrote:
If the analyses are to be useful, *all* the flagged words and phrases
need to be linked to potential replacements.
Very few are listed on the INI word list [1].
The following need suggested replacements:
- sanity check
- dummy value
- grandfather
- gr[ea]ybear
If the analyses are to be useful, *all* the flagged words and phrases
need to be linked to potential replacements.
Very few are listed on the INI word list [1].
The following need suggested replacements:
- sanity check
- dummy value
- grandfather
- gr[ea]ybeard
- insane
- lame
- man hours
- retar
On 8/30/21 2:53 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
P.S. The diversity site is not totally clean.
I don't know what this means. Can you please elaborate?
Aha. You're referring to
https://clc.diversity.apache.org/analysis.html?project=diversity-site.git
Yes, that's true.
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbow
On 8/30/21 2:36 PM, sebb wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 13:25, Rich Bowen wrote:
On 8/30/21 6:07 AM, sebb wrote:
The CLC checker flags lots of words, but does not give any help to
projects in how to replace them.
Whilst different contexts may require different solutions, it would
help to
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 19:36, sebb wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 13:25, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/30/21 6:07 AM, sebb wrote:
> > > The CLC checker flags lots of words, but does not give any help to
> > > projects in how to replace them.
> > >
> > > Whilst different contexts may r
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 13:25, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/30/21 6:07 AM, sebb wrote:
> > The CLC checker flags lots of words, but does not give any help to
> > projects in how to replace them.
> >
> > Whilst different contexts may require different solutions, it would
> > help to at least point
[dropping mixed lists]
On 30/08/2021 13.27, sebb wrote:
"We ask that people do not add or remove project repositories without
prior notice ..."
I read that as: D&I don't need permission to scan a project and
(potentially) report it as problematic, but projects do need
permission to stop the scan
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 19:04, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/08/30 17:09:02, Dave Fisher wrote:
> > I’ve glanced at the scans and in general I don’t see these as helpful. I
> > don’t want to put my volunteer time into “fixing” or reviewing this. The
> > word “master” is in the specifications
On 8/30/21 6:07 AM, sebb wrote:
The CLC checker flags lots of words, but does not give any help to
projects in how to replace them.
Whilst different contexts may require different solutions, it would
help to at least point to some pages where previously worked out
solutions are described.
Ot
The CLC checker flags lots of words, but does not give any help to
projects in how to replace them.
Whilst different contexts may require different solutions, it would
help to at least point to some pages where previously worked out
solutions are described.
Otherwise projects are likely to waste
13 matches
Mail list logo
