On 10/8/2014 8:49 PM, Jo Walsh wrote:
Okay, my gloss on this is that the Code of Conduct is a kind of
shibboleth and a kind of insurance policy.
You need one in order to be seen taking this stuff seriously
The argument raised recently was that having a CoC helps diversity, and
is not a
I'm not arguing for an exception for unacceptable behavior, but I am
saying that we need to be cognizant of a few issues:
1. Whereas the Code of Conduct presumes that most behavior is done
with full knowledge and intent, we cannot really assume that. We can't
assume that if someone is behaving in
A few quick comments (more thoughtful ones hopefully to follow).
1. Whereas the Code of Conduct presumes that most behavior is done
with full knowledge and intent, we cannot really assume that. We can't
assume that if someone is behaving in a way that we dislike, that it
must be purposeful.
