Sorry if this has been mentioned but I couldn't find any reference to
it.
Anyway, there seems to be an issue with custom save() hooks and the
admin interface. When called from the shell .save() works as expected,
executing code both before and after the call to super(). However, in
the admin,
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Don't mean to pester but is there a way for me to post the list on the
> wiki? Like I said, I think I'm blocked now. :(
Ouch, I'm sorry. :-( I'm sure Jacob meant to get back to you, but I
know he's been insanely busy with
Don't mean to pester but is there a way for me to post the list on the
wiki? Like I said, I think I'm blocked now. :(
Cheers,
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To
> functionality in django.utils.dateformat introduces some other
Well, consider that under-documented. It's not clear how to do that as
a filter in the Template Guide.
I'll agree that it's outside the scope of 'humanize'.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
On 7/24/06, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably, this is more a question for the user list.
Actually, after around sixteen hours of off and on fiddling with
things via IRC, I suggested she ticket it and post here to see if any
of the rapid-fire Django bug squashing team at
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> If your goal is to cut crontab entries from five to one, just create a
> single script that does the five things you need it to do; then point
> crontab at it. :)
But it would be fine for pluggable applications to make this
automatically! (I'm +1)
Michael
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2006, at 9:37 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > Rather than watch the "inherit from User" thread go round and round,
> > maybe I should give people something more concrete to think about.
First of all, +1 on this proposal. I've been approaching this problem
Hi Aurynn,
Aurynn wrote:
> Hi there, I'm getting some very odd behaviour when trying to use
> unique_together, foreign keys, and AddManipulator() all together on
> some of my models.
>
> http://rafb.net/paste/results/kIEaT886.html - Company model
> http://rafb.net/paste/results/V3XUxE96.html -
Hi there, I'm getting some very odd behaviour when trying to use
unique_together, foreign keys, and AddManipulator() all together on
some of my models.
http://rafb.net/paste/results/kIEaT886.html - Company model
http://rafb.net/paste/results/V3XUxE96.html - Notes model
These are the models I'm
One other side effect of the problem noted in my message above is this:
If I enter "1e5" in the text field, it fails validation (as I'm
limiting it to -?\d+(\.\d+)? ), but the new_data entry still gets
converted to a Decimal instance, so the form displays an error message
but the data in the box
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>
> A good example might be to look at the ``DateField`` definition
> (http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/db/models/
> fields/__init__.py#L393).
>
> As far as I remember, the methods you'll want to play with are
> ``Field.to_python()``,
Have you considered migrating the data from MSSQL to Postgres? We ran
into the same problem you are having, and purchased the "DTM Migration
Kit". http://www.sqledit.com/mk/index.html
This tool lets you do arbitrary sql on migration, so if the MSSQL
database is being used by another app, you
Bill de hÓra wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
>> table design with
>> lots of sparse columns won't get me invited to the cool parties.
>
> Qotd!
>
(added to my quotes-collection :-)
gabor
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> table design with
> lots of sparse columns won't get me invited to the cool parties.
Qotd!
[I should say what you're doing sounds great; just trying to figure out
where the constraints and gotchas are at.]
cheers
Bill
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 17:12 +0100, Bill de hÓra wrote:
> > Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > > ---
> > > 3. What you don't get
> > > ---
> > > [...]
> > > I am not implementing the "everything in one table" storage model. It is
> >
Hi there,
Is there a reason why CheckboxField(and model's BooleanField) doesn't
have validator_list ? We discussed briefly this issue on irc and seems
like its just because of lack of use cases for validation ? In my case i
need to check other field's value and only if it has specific
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> Rather than watch the "inherit from User" thread go round and round,
> maybe I should give people something more concrete to think about.
>
> This is a follow-up to the mail I sent late on Friday. It describes the
> area where we need API additions or some kind of
sorry for cross post.
I just want to bring some attention to this thread
http://groups.google.com/group/Django-I18N/browse_thread/thread/f33c087fc57fb2bc/44aecc7ee75f676f#44aecc7ee75f676f
We currently have great i18n implementation, but not l10n - yes, we have
date-aware template filters/tags
18 matches
Mail list logo
