Re: Extending templates programmatically (redux)

2006-07-28 Thread Bryan Chow
I noticed that this ticket has just been closed. Just wanted to say Thanks to the Django dev team for finally accepting our patch! http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1650 Cheers, Bryan :) Bryan Chow wrote: > Just wanted to bring attention back to this issue. A few months ago, > Ian Clelland

Re: Free SVN and Issue Tracker

2006-07-28 Thread Peter Ma
When I use google ajax search api,and got the key,use the example html. javascript error On 7/28/06, Deryck Hodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/27/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > FWIWwebfaction has offered this for a while for python > > http://www.webfaction.com/freetrac

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Bill de hÓra
Deryck Hodge wrote: > On 7/27/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Make a setting to turn define the default, and if the setting's not >> there, auto-escape. >> Anyone that doesn't want it can just turn it off by defining the setting. >> >> AUTO_ESCAPE_TEXT = _True_|False > > This is th

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread James Bennett
On 7/28/06, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scope it per template: > > {% extends "base_generic.html" %} > {% escape %} > > This lets people who want auto-escaping, have it, without typing in > "|escape" everywhere or screwing things up site wide with globals. Yeah. AFAIK that's pretty

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Todd O'Bryan
I must say I really like Luke's (I think it was Luke) idea of different tags for escaping vs. auto-escaping. What if we deprecated {{ }} and replaced it with an escape tag and a raw tag? It would keep backward compatibility, but would encourage people to use escaped strings unless they have

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Simon Willison
On 28 Jul 2006, at 13:06, Todd O'Bryan wrote: > What if we deprecated {{ }} and replaced it with an escape tag and a > raw tag? It would keep backward compatibility, but would encourage > people to use escaped strings unless they have a reason to use raw > ones. I suppose we don't really have to

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On 7/27/06, Deryck Hodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/27/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Make a setting to turn define the default, and if the setting's not > > there, auto-escape. > > Anyone that doesn't want it can just turn it off by defining the setting. > > > > AUTO_ESC

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Ahmad Alhashemi
Simon Willison wrote: > Here's an idea I don't think anyone has brought up yet: what if > escaping was on by default for templates ending in .html and off by > default for templates ending in .txt? This does seem like a practical solution. But I think that it gives more meaning to template file n

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Deryck Hodge
On 7/28/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, I'll hold my water until we hear back from Jacob et al. > I didn't mean to seem like I was saying "so shut up already". :-) This just keeps coming up with the same arguments for and against over and over again. My apologies if I seemed ha

Re: Free SVN and Issue Tracker

2006-07-28 Thread Deryck Hodge
On 7/28/06, Peter Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I use google ajax search api,and got the key,use the example html. > javascript error Hi, Peter. This is not the forum for Google code errors. This is a Django developers group. Try the codesite-discuss group. http://groups.google.com/gr

Issue #1030 - inline entities in admin with auto_now_add tend to die

2006-07-28 Thread yk4ever
Stumbled upon ticket #1030 while writing my app, got angry. Investigated the code and came to conclusion that the most probable source of problem is this: django_src/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py class DateField(Field): def get_follow(self, override=None): if override != None:

Re: Strip Whitespace Middleware

2006-07-28 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 7/27/06, Doug Van Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know if anyone will find this useful, but I thought I'd throw > it out there. > > I wrote a little Middleware class to strip trailing and leading > whitespace from a response: Hey Doug, Thanks for contributing this! If you could, pos

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Steven Armstrong
On 07/28/06 15:34, Ahmad Alhashemi wrote: > > Bill de hÓra wrote: >> Scope it per template: >> >> {% extends "base_generic.html" %} >> {% escape %} >> >> This lets people who want auto-escaping, have it, without typing in >> "|escape" everywhere or screwing things up site wide with globals. > >

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 12:39 +0100, Bill de hÓra wrote: > Deryck Hodge wrote: > > On 7/27/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Make a setting to turn define the default, and if the setting's not > >> there, auto-escape. > >> Anyone that doesn't want it can just turn it off by defining t

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Jul 27, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Simon Willison wrote: > Here's an idea I don't think anyone has brought up yet: what if > escaping was on by default for templates ending in .html and off by > default for templates ending in .txt? > > I'm not sure how I feel about this, seeing as we only recently made

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 7/27/06, Simon Willison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's an idea I don't think anyone has brought up yet: what if > escaping was on by default for templates ending in .html and off by > default for templates ending in .txt? I'm not keen on coupling the template filename to the template cont

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread Roland van Laar
On Jul 28, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > On 7/27/06, Simon Willison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Here's an idea I don't think anyone has brought up yet: what if >> escaping was on by default for templates ending in .html and off by >> default for templates ending in .txt? > > I'm

Re: Default escaping -- again!

2006-07-28 Thread James Bennett
On 7/28/06, Roland van Laar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be better to couple it with the mimetype? A text/plain should > by default not be excaped. What would be *best* is for there to be no magical implied escaping/unescaping of anything, only explicit escaping/unescaping based on a tem

Idea for ManyTomManyField extention

2006-07-28 Thread Neilen Marais
Hi I'm just testing the waters to see what people think about an extended ManyToManyField type that allows the addition of extra info to a link withouth having to use an intermediary table/model like here: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/models/m2m_intermediary/ . Using the intermedia

Re: Idea for ManyTomManyField extention

2006-07-28 Thread Ian Holsman
Hi Neilen.I think this would be a good idea, as I frequently have a M2M type relationship with one or two fields on that field.but personally I just use foreign keys on the middle table, as I think it makes the code more readable, and allows you to be moreflexible with it. (for example a M2M with a

Re: Ticket 2445 - limit_choices_to - allow callable(value).

2006-07-28 Thread Michael Hamilton
I've raised Ticket 2445 and attached a small patch - it sounds similar to Ticket 2193, but 2193 might be intended to be even more general (not just values). http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2445 http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2193 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~---

Re: Consider releasing a .95 beta

2006-07-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm pretty late on this, but for the record... ...while I totally appreciate that you're reading my blog and you value what I think, the truth is that my feelings on the matter are almost completely irrelevant. When to release a build is entirely up to Adrian, Jacob, and the other core developers

Re: Ticket 2445 - limit_choices_to - allow callable(value).

2006-07-28 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 7/29/06, Michael Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've raised Ticket 2445 and attached a small patch - it sounds similar toTicket 2193, but 2193 might be intended to be even more general (not justvalues).Looks like a duplicate to me - I've marked #2193 as such (patch trumps empty ticket). Th