Hi
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> What I don't think is the right answer is to suddenly start making
> gettext() behave as if it were ugettext() -- using the wrong name for
> something will lead to confusion for people who use Django as a tool,
> not as a lifestyle choice.
Certainly. Think about th
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 20:35 -0700, Simon G. wrote:
> Sorry - I just skim read the discussions on it in "AutoEscape" and
> "AutoEscaping Alternative" where that was mentioned. Wasn't making any
> value judgements :-)
Unfortunately, the AutoEscapingAlternative page uses strawmen to try and
make its
Sorry - I just skim read the discussions on it in "AutoEscape" and
"AutoEscaping Alternative" where that was mentioned. Wasn't making any
value judgements :-)
--Simon
On Apr 18, 2:49 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 05:00 -0700, Simon G. wrote:
>
> If you
Hey Michael,
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 10:31 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> Hi Malcom and you all,
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> > What I'd really like from you guys (Michael, Ivan, Gábor -- and anybody
> > else who wants to play along) is to see how the code fits in with your
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 09:08 -0400, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> I've been following this discussion with interest. XSS fragility is a
> real weak point for text-based templating engines, and we need to find a
> solution.
>
> On the topic of HTML-escaping vs. general escaping: Absolutely the
> reas
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 05:00 -0700, Simon G. wrote:
> This is one of those issues which is never going to please everyone.
>
> So - I've started a list of the various proposals (1), and could you
> all add any other proposals to this page, along with any pros/cons,
> and vote on the one(s) you pre
On 4/17/07, Gulopine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My main questions are these:
>
> * Am I right in thinking that Django's to_python method should be used
> for type coercion, rather than relying solely on backend drivers?
Historically, to_python existed for the manipulator framework to
convert t
I wouldn't think this would actually work but I just put the objects =
models.GeoManager() on my model and it now knows what to do with the
spatial queries. Excellent.
On 4/17/07, mattxbart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys, I'm working with the GeoDjango branch and I was wondering if
> ther
Hey guys, I'm working with the GeoDjango branch and I was wondering if
there are any plans to allow something like I have below:
>>> ParcelSale.objects.filter(parcel__poly__contained=cpa.get_poly_wkt())
"parcel" is a foreign key to the geometry model information:
class Parcel(models.Model,model
Clarification:
I threw together my response really fast and it does not really get
the discussion started on this, and I did not mean to recommend my
extension implementation; just the opposite, it sucks.
Lets try this again.
I like your Idea allot and have had to do some questionable extensions
Hey Michel --
Please direct questions of this nature to django-users; django-dev is
used to discuss the development of Django itself, not to answer usage
questions.
Thanks!
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
I think this is a good Idea, and even better one would be to have it
use a related field name, so that any other field can be used, not
just the PK or ID.
I have an implementation that is no where near as useful (as it does
not support pattern replacement) called RelatedFileField (could
easilly b
Hi guys!
I done a cool functionality to my site, the possibility to resize
images on demand. It's not 100% done yet but my goal is to do
something like:
...
class Article(models.Model):
photo = models.ImageField(upload_to='some/path/some/where')
def get_photo_200x200(self):
retur
Hi guys!
I thinking on the possibility to put the id of object on the path
where a image will be uploaded. Ex:
class Test(models.Model):
image = models.ImageField(upload_to='path/%Y/%m/%d/%(id)d')
This way I can preserve the file name untouched and can be sure will
have a unique filename. I
On Tue, Apr 17, Tom Tobin wrote:
> I think you misunderstood me; I'm not saying there should be a
> general-output escaping framework. I'm saying that if there *is* an
> HTML escaping framework, the object/variable naming should make it
> clear that we're dealing with HTML-specific escaping wher
Hi all,
I had submitted a patch recently (#3982) that forces Django to use the
to_python method of individual fields when retrieving objects from a
database. I'm not being impatient, but I'd like to get some additional
feedback on this, in case I'm going about it all wrong, or if I'm
missing some
On 4/17/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm still -1 on autoescaping as implemented in the latest patch in
> > #2359; the terminology used is strongly HTML-centric (e.g.,
> > ``convert_to_words.is_safe`` -- safe from what?). We should be using
> > naming that makes it expli
I've been following this discussion with interest. XSS fragility is a
real weak point for text-based templating engines, and we need to find a
solution.
On the topic of HTML-escaping vs. general escaping: Absolutely the
reason to do auto-escaping is to make it dead easy to avoid XSS
problems
On 4/16/07, Brian Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For "T", the docs say that it will output the "Time zone of this machine".
> To me, this implies that it will read from tzdata. However, this actually
> outputs the time zone specified in the project settings file, which I think
> is the inten
This is one of those issues which is never going to please everyone.
So - I've started a list of the various proposals (1), and could you
all add any other proposals to this page, along with any pros/cons,
and vote on the one(s) you prefer.
This way we can get some idea of what a consensus view
Hi Malcom and you all,
On Tue, Apr 10, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> What I'd really like from you guys (Michael, Ivan, Gábor -- and anybody
> else who wants to play along) is to see how the code fits in with your
> existing workflow.
How do the translation functions gettext() (_()) etc. fit in?
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Apr 16, Tom Tobin wrote:
> I haven't been participating much on Django-dev over the last few
> months, but this made me go "eep?".
>
> I'm still -1 on autoescaping as implemented in the latest patch in
> #2359; the terminology used is strongly HTML-centric (e.g.,
> ``convert_to_
22 matches
Mail list logo
