Hello,
> I'm trying to integrate S3 support into my Django app using
> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/AmazonSimpleStorageService for
> now.
>
> I would like to improve the code so that it might be officially
> integrated into Django at some point. The first obvious question: Is
> this a featu
FYI: I've also contributed a patch for this ticket:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3624
It adds some extra support so the feeds don't need to hit the
filesystem just to pull in a simple template.
-Rob
On Aug 7, 4:28 am, jorjun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done. Thanks for guidance.
>
> >
On 09-Aug-07, at 1:56 AM, Brantley Harris wrote:
> "hint" seems like the wrong word. "suggest", "guide", "auto",
> "build"?
preview?
--
regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Please do not post general help questions to the django-developers
mailing list; this list is only for discussion of Django's code. For
general help, please post questions to the django-users mailing list:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/
--
"Bureaucrat Conrad, you are technically c
hi,
I have this model which doesn't work when using select_related(). What
happen is django seems to be in a infinite loop.
class Employee(models.Model):
employee_contract = models.ForeignKey('EmployeeContract',
related_name='contracted_employee')
employee_assignment = models.ForeignKe
> Sorry, perhaps I don't quite understand how this is different...
> unless you are rendering the field widget manually and somehow adding
> extra choices that aren't in the query set passed to the
> Model*ChoiceField?
There would be one extra choice - the previously selected, and no
longer valid
> Plainly put, the system should work without requiring configuration.
I agree!
--
I like python!
UliPad <>: http://code.google.com/p/ulipad/
My Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Aug 9, 5:49 am, oggie rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That could work. The main point of this thread was to see if there are
> > use cases for using the default manager for validation instead of the
> > query set because I couldn't really think of any - but I'm sure there
> > could well be s
On 8/8/07, John-Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to integrate S3 support into my Django app using
> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/AmazonSimpleStorageService for
> now.
>
> I would like to improve the code so that it might be officially
> integrated into Django at
Hello all,
I'm trying to integrate S3 support into my Django app using
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/AmazonSimpleStorageService for
now.
I would like to improve the code so that it might be officially
integrated into Django at some point. The first obvious question: Is
this a feature that o
> That could work. The main point of this thread was to see if there are
> use cases for using the default manager for validation instead of the
> query set because I couldn't really think of any - but I'm sure there
> could well be some.
Like the one I explained? :)
I think the strongest argume
On 8/4/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My goals:
> * Keep the model file as a canonical representation of what the tables
> should look like right now.
> * Keep each migration as an atomic unit.
> * Provide an entry point for raw SQL migrations
> * Provide some validation that
I find that on a few occasions, I've needed to generate extra SQL for
both creation and deletion tasks when I'm executing "manage.py syncdb"
(or sql, or reset, sqlclear, etc., pretty much all of the SQL generation
commands). Currently, if you use only use syncdb for everything, you
can do thi
On 8/8/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I *do* think is worth fixing is allowing the template system to
> be used on its own, for the simple, common case, without having to
> configure stuff. This is what I was trying to explain in my last
> e-mail. Tom, if we solved that, w
On 8/8/07, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think there's a good psychological / community case to be made for
> making django.template available standalone; as I put it earlier, many
> people just don't like importing stuff they don't intend to use, no
> matter how small it may be byte-wi
On 8/8/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/8/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A couple of other areas are going to be at least equally as
> > interesting...
>
> Malcolm has made some *really* good points throughout this thread, and
> I'm convinced that goin
On 8/8/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A couple of other areas are going to be at least equally as
> interesting...
Malcolm has made some *really* good points throughout this thread, and
I'm convinced that going down this path would be a not-so-good idea.
My opinion on it at
On 8/8/07, Robert Coup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/08/2007, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/8/07, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'd ideally like the Django installer to detect if django.template was
> > > already on the system, and drop Django into the sam
On 8/8/07, Derek Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1) Isn't the list of known schema fingerprints just the list of keys
> > in the migration graph/dictionary?
>
> no. it adds ordering. (the keys are a set remember) we wouldn't need
> it if python had something similar to java's LinkedHa
On 8/8/07, Derek Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> as i said before i'm not wed to it. (actually i feel it's a rather
> minor point) propose a different location. i just want it somewhere
> simple and obvious. (or if you two just hate the keyword, what would
> you like to call it?)
Its
On 08/08/2007, Derek Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> i have had this exact situation happen to me before. (rolling out a
> change, then another change reversing it) actually several times. i
> have NEVER had a scenario where client Y says "can you please make sure
> i lose my data?"
>
On 08/08/2007, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/8/07, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd ideally like the Django installer to detect if django.template was
> > already on the system, and drop Django into the same spot. As far as
> > versioning, Django should check for
This code is what I said
from django.conf import settings
class URLNode(Node):
def __init__(self, view_name, args,kwargs,as_name):
self.view_name = view_name
self.args = args
self.kwargs = kwargs
self.as_name = as_name
def render(self, context):
fr
sorry , fix some error
from django.conf import settings
from django.template import Node
class URLNode(Node):
def __init__(self, view_name, args,kwargs,as_name):
self.view_name = view_name
self.args = args
self.kwargs = kwargs
self.as_name = as_name
def re
because if I want to get the link first , then get the count number .
if I just use reverse() in my custom tag, I have to write like below
xxx
Digg:{% access_count_url music "rock",112 %}
I write the same things twice , and if I want write a link such as
"add to shopping list" I have to write the
Couldn't you just use reverse() in your custom tag?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe f
26 matches
Mail list logo
