On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Marc Fargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> So, would a signal there be useful? (no ticket filled yet) And, where
> can one hook code for that? :)
>
I seem to recall this request being made from time to time. IIRC, it
always turned out that whoever asked didn't
Hi all,
Now that the trunk is open for enhancements, I would like to ask the
core developers for their opinion on ticket 8122: better way of
testing for cookies [1]. Chris Beaven looked at the ticket and
suggested I bring it up here to solicit comments.
The ticket addresses the awkward
Hi there,
Staring at #8638 I'm trying to find a way to hook code to be run "just
after Django is completelly loaded" and found no way ;(
The thing is, it's a really nice place to emit a signal if you want to
do things "just after things are ready", but there's no signal for it.
And, as I found
Hi ppl,
In the contributing docs we can read:
After a branch has been merged, it should be considered "dead";
write access to
it will be disabled, and old branches will be periodically "trimmed."
My English is not very good but I always understood that as "we'll
remove them when they
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Richard Davies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps it's now time for a '1.0.1' milestone in the ticket tracker,
> to nominate those tickets which are simple bug fixes against '1.0'?
No.
Right now any bug at all that was present in 1.0 is a candidate for fixing.
Please move this conversation to django-users. Django-developers is for the
discussion pertaining to the maintenance and development of the django
framework itself.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Erik Allik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nevermind the previous e-mail.
>
> On 01.10.2008, at
Nevermind the previous e-mail.
On 01.10.2008, at 17:10, David Hall wrote:
>
> I've just released an open-source version control application for
> Django. It is available for download from Google code.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/django-reversion/
>
> Features include:
>
> - Roll back to any
Hi David,
Is this integrate with Subversion or any Version Control Tool?
Regards,
-LN
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:10 AM, David Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've just released an open-source version control application for
> Django. It is available for download from Google code.
>
>
Is it an alternative to django-evolution and dmigrations? If not, does
it provide a subset of the features of the two?
Erik
On 01.10.2008, at 17:10, David Hall wrote:
>
> I've just released an open-source version control application for
> Django. It is available for download from Google
I've just released an open-source version control application for
Django. It is available for download from Google code.
http://code.google.com/p/django-reversion/
Features include:
- Roll back to any point in a model's history - an unlimited undo
facility!
- Recover deleted models -
Hi everybody, and first thanks to everyone involved in Django's
developpement.
I recently discovered that when extending a base template,
templatetags outside a block node in the 'extending' template where
just ignored. This of course makes perfect sense for content-rendering
tags, but can be a
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Brett H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I cringe at posting this but.. there's a little forward slash that
> suddenly appeared on the Django website documentation url
>
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev//
>
> Is it just visiting or should I re-bookmark?
This
I cringe at posting this but.. there's a little forward slash that
suddenly appeared on the Django website documentation url
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev//
Is it just visiting or should I re-bookmark?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Hi,
#689 Honour Webserver Provided Auth (REMOTE_USER)
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/689
I use it this patch since several weeks. This patch only adds new
stuff, thus it wont' break running code.
Why not commit it?
Thomas
PS: The current code is in a git repository linked in the
Great!
Perhaps it's now time for a '1.0.1' milestone in the ticket tracker,
to nominate those tickets which are simple bug fixes against '1.0'?
Clearly still too early for '1.1' milestone, etc, given that there's a
different process started for that
Cheers,
Richard.
Streaming/iterable HttpResponse instances are kind of an issue which
needs sorting out. I've had problems in the past with the current
implementation. Maybe a closer look is actually necessary.
Regards,
Zack
On Oct 1, 3:41 am, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Graham, I'll check
> Short version: model-aware validation is being worked on. We didn't get
> it finished for 1.0, but it's still ongoing work.
Wouldn't it be nice to replace these three parameters by something like:
class SomeModel(models.Model):
[...]
class Meta:
unique_together = ('title',
17 matches
Mail list logo
