On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> FYI -- since this Windows Python 2.5.x problem doesn't appear to be
> something we'll be able to figure out before I turn into a pumpkin and have
> to go to sleep, and I'm not sure what you are thinking about with regard to
> committing the c
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick <
malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 01:25 -0500, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> [...]
> > Ok, then perhaps using the namespace syntax you suggested would work
> > nicely
> >
> > {% url admin_site:"admin_logout" %}
>
> Ideally, the
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 01:25 -0500, Alex Gaynor wrote:
[...]
> Ok, then perhaps using the namespace syntax you suggested would work
> nicely
>
> {% url admin_site:"admin_logout" %}
Ideally, the url tag would operate on the names of things, rather than
jamming objects and strings together like thi
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick <
malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 00:49 -0500, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> [...]
> > Actually all we need to do is add a prefix argument to the url tag,
> > and then just pass admin_site.name to prefix, all this kwarg has to d
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 00:49 -0500, Alex Gaynor wrote:
[...]
> Actually all we need to do is add a prefix argument to the url tag,
> and then just pass admin_site.name to prefix, all this kwarg has to do
> is add the string of the view name and the prefix together and
> tada-namespaces. I think th
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick <
malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 22:36 -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> > Hey Malcolm --
> >
> > Sorry if I missed some steps on this one; I've been working on it
> > pretty hard for the past few days and thought it
FYI -- since this Windows Python 2.5.x problem doesn't appear to be
something we'll be able to figure out before I turn into a pumpkin and have
to go to sleep, and I'm not sure what you are thinking about with regard to
committing the code -- the rest of the test suite runs normally on the
Windows
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 22:36 -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hey Malcolm --
>
> Sorry if I missed some steps on this one; I've been working on it
> pretty hard for the past few days and thought it was done (though I've
> already noticed an oversight with the password change link... grr...).
>
>
Hey Malcolm --
Sorry if I missed some steps on this one; I've been working on it
pretty hard for the past few days and thought it was done (though I've
already noticed an oversight with the password change link... grr...).
I should point out that there is docs
(http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/d
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
freakboy3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> > wrote:
> >> Next suggestion is to check if the converters that are registered on
> >> lines
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 22:52 -0500, Alex Gaynor wrote:
[...]
> What this ticket allows is:
> a) handling the admin site/model admin urls through the normal
> resolver method
> b) reversing these URLs
>
> The main problem you describe is that the multiple admin sites that
> any url tags we make use
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick <
malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote:
>
> I realise the confusion I'm about to cause here is predominantly my
> fault for not working faster, but I thought I'd have a bit more time
> than I did. So a massive mea culpa there.
>
> Anyway, I have some
I realise the confusion I'm about to cause here is predominantly my
fault for not working faster, but I thought I'd have a bit more time
than I did. So a massive mea culpa there.
Anyway, I have some questions and concerns about r9739 that Jacob
committed overnight (my time) that maybe can be clea
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
>> > Yeah, that's the direction I was heading in. Only I didn't have to go
>> > so
>> > far as trying against trunk.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> > Yeah, that's the direction I was heading in. Only I didn't have to go so
> > far as trying against trunk. Even with the aggregate code,
> >
> Book.objects.filter(pk=1).v
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Karen Tracey wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Karen Tracey
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Russell
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Help, yes. Illuminating, No. :-(
>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
> freakboy3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Karen Tracey
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Help,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Help, yes. Illuminating, No. :-(
> >>
> >> To fill you in on what I'm looking for - every aggregate
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> Help, yes. Illuminating, No. :-(
>>
>> To fill you in on what I'm looking for - every aggregate value coming
>> back from the database passes through resolve_aggregates() i
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> Help, yes. Illuminating, No. :-(
>
> To fill you in on what I'm looking for - every aggregate value coming
> back from the database passes through resolve_aggregates() in
> django.db.models.query.py (line 212). This passes to convert_v
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> If you have any objections or probl
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Ian Kelly
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
I'm seeing the same errors using the tarball snapshot. Al
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> If you have any objections or problem reports, speak now or live with
> >> the consequences :-)
> >
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> I'm seeing the same errors using the tarball snapshot. All but the
>>> last one are fixed by the attached patch.
>>
>>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Ramiro Morales wrote:
> Karen,
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> >
> > I'm getting some errors running the aggregation and aggregation_regress
> > tests on Windows boxes running Python 2.5.2 and 2.5.4 when using sqlite
> as
> > the databa
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> I'm seeing the same errors using the tarball snapshot. All but the
>> last one are fixed by the attached patch.
>
> By "the last one" I actually mean the final failure where a float is
>
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> If you have any objections or problem reports, speak now or live with
>> the consequences :-)
>
> I'm getting some errors running the aggregation and aggregation_regress
>
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
>> I'm also seeing failures when using Oracle as the backend, many tracebacks
>> that end with:
>>
>> File "d:\u\kmt\django\aggregation\django\db\backends\oracle\query.py", line
>> 69, in co
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Eric Holscher wrote:
> I think that if there is a plan to ever include fixtures into doctests, then
> we should put transaction management into them. We should also decide on a
> syntax (__fixtures__ really isn't too bad). This is mostly a bikeshed, where
> if it'
Karen,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Karen Tracey wrote:
>
> I'm getting some errors running the aggregation and aggregation_regress
> tests on Windows boxes running Python 2.5.2 and 2.5.4 when using sqlite as
> the database.� I do not see these failures on these boxes using 'sqlite3'
> backen
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> Just to clarify -- the failure I hit in the Django test suite after
> re-ordering rolled back test cases to run first is not one where a test
> assumes another runs before it (rather the reverse) or one that can be
> triggered currently by ju
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I'm seeing the same errors using the tarball snapshot. All but the
> last one are fixed by the attached patch.
By "the last one" I actually mean the final failure where a float is
expected but an int is seen.
Ian
--~--~-~--~~---
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> I'm also seeing failures when using Oracle as the backend, many tracebacks
> that end with:
>
> File "d:\u\kmt\django\aggregation\django\db\backends\oracle\query.py", line
> 69, in convert_values
> elif value is not None and field.get_in
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Sebastian Bauer wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I think it's a bug, but maybe im wrong:
>
>
> print Categories.objects.count()
> >>0
> new_obj = Categories.objects.create(name="test")
> instance_1 = Categories.objects.get(pk=new_obj.pk)
> instance_2 = Categories.objects.get(p
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Sebastian Bauer wrote:
> how orm can save second instance of the same row when its deleted?
Deleting an object won't magically remove all references to it - the
instance_2 variable still has a perfectly valid object, so saving it
just reinserts a new copy of it.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
freakboy3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you have any objections or problem reports, speak now or live with
> the consequences :-)
>
I'm getting some errors running the aggregation and aggregation_regress
tests on Windows boxes running Python 2
Hi
I think it's a bug, but maybe im wrong:
print Categories.objects.count()
>>0
new_obj = Categories.objects.create(name="test")
instance_1 = Categories.objects.get(pk=new_obj.pk)
instance_2 = Categories.objects.get(pk=new_obj.pk)
instance_1.delete()
print Kategorie.objects.count()
>>0
inst
Actually before I get a "wtf" response, I should note that the two
generators do not quite match. One is rendering a template, the other
is simply yielding XML. The latter approach is what I prefer, but I
was rushing to finish the index generator :)
On Jan 14, 11:49 am, David Cramer wrote:
> Whi
While the Sitemaps framework in Django is fairly complete, there's a
few things it's lacking, namely the ability to specify attributes for
a Sitemap index file. We ended up rewriting our sitemaps, but I wanted
to throw our code up here for an example of what we came up. Keep in
mind that we are wr
> Are other developers interested in "readonly unitests on live data", too?
At our company we mostly test our Django apps with "live" data for
various reasons.
Our process is roughly following: 1. we make a sql-dump of the current
production data (or part of it if it's REALLY big) and move it t
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> I have now finished work on ticket #3566 - adding aggregations to Django's
> ORM.
Woohoo! Congratulations, and many thanks to you, Nicolas, and all the
others who helped out.
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~--
Vladimir Prudnikov wrote:
> So, at my point it, lets say, "bad style" of coding. The idea is to
> keep original field content without any modification. XML and RSS
> specification allow and recommend it, why to not use it?
As Malcolm said, Django does use it, i.e. it does escape HTML to
pres
Problem solved: Turns out that I had a
import django.core.files.storage
line in my settings.py which triggered the initialization of
default_storage before my own settings.py was parsed. Obviously, the
development server has a different import order than modpython ...
/Raik
On Jan 12, 7:54 pm,
Thank you Karen for your work.
Some weeks ago I wanted to write an "always_rollback" decorator, but found
that it was not that easy, since Postgres transactions can't be nested. The
first COMMIT commits everything. [1]
I want to run readonly unittests on my live data. I looked at your
patch, and
46 matches
Mail list logo
