On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Johannes Dollinger
> wrote:
>>
>> The m2m-refactor patch breaks ManyToManyFields on abstract models:
>> "AssertionError: ForeignKey cannot define a relation with abstract
>> class A"
>
> Thanks for the
How does the csrf_token affect TestCase.client.post() ?
On Oct 31, 9:28 am, rebus_ wrote:
> I would go with the idea that your settings are probably wrong. Just
> tried trunk and it seems to work fine.
>
> You should
> read:http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/csrf/#upgrading-notes
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Johannes Dollinger
wrote:
>
> The m2m-refactor patch breaks ManyToManyFields on abstract models:
> "AssertionError: ForeignKey cannot define a relation with abstract
> class A"
Thanks for the report, Johannes. I'll take a look at this and see what
I can do about
The m2m-refactor patch breaks ManyToManyFields on abstract models:
"AssertionError: ForeignKey cannot define a relation with abstract
class A"
{{{
class R(models.Model): pass
class A(models.Model):
r_set = models.ManyToManyField(R, related_name="%(class)s_set")
class Meta:
I would go with the idea that your settings are probably wrong. Just
tried trunk and it seems to work fine.
You should read:
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/csrf/#upgrading-notes
Also, this is list is not for general Django troubleshooting but
rather for Django development.
Dav
I get this output from a newly created project with the latest trunk:
-
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "E:\Python26\lib\site-
I just updated my django installation to the latest trunk.
I'm new do Django but I'm having this problem, I just ran the usual:
django-admin.py startproject testprj
cd testprj
(edited settings.py so it uses a sqlite3 database)
python manage.py syncdb
python manage.py runserver
Once the server is
>>> I'm keen to see a resolution to this problem. To that end, I'm
>>> interested in hearing specific criticisms or concerns with the
>>> current backend proposal. I'm also interested in any alternate
>>> approaches to this problem.
>
> Amusingly it appears that since Jannis got his wings^H^H^H^
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday 25 October 2009 07:22:27 Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>
>>> I'm keen to see a resolution to this problem. To that end, I'm
>>> interested in hearing specific criticisms or c
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> On Sunday 25 October 2009 07:22:27 Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
>> I'm keen to see a resolution to this problem. To that end, I'm
>> interested in hearing specific criticisms or concerns with the
>> current backend proposal. I'm also intere
On Sunday 25 October 2009 07:22:27 Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> I'm keen to see a resolution to this problem. To that end, I'm
> interested in hearing specific criticisms or concerns with the
> current backend proposal. I'm also interested in any alternate
> approaches to this problem.
I'm com
On Oct 25, 3:22 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The v1.2 votes are in, and it appears that Email-01 (introducing an
> email backend API) needs some more discussion.
>
> I am in complete agreement that Django shouldn't try to become an
> email framework. That isn't the intention of t
On Oct 30, 4:33 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just finished the polishing the first part of Alex's GSoC work to
> add Multi-db, which I'd like to commit. This is a call for feedback.
I forgot to mention - the patch _should_ be completely backwards
compatible, and require no
Hi all,
I've just finished the polishing the first part of Alex's GSoC work to
add Multi-db, which I'd like to commit. This is a call for feedback.
This first patch isn't directly related to multi-db, but it is a
prerequisite that will allow the multi-db code to function. The goal
of this patch
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> I haven't had a chance to look at it, and I probably won't until at
> least a few of the items on my plate are dealt with. That being said
> I am extremely leery about investing time in something with names like
> "QueryGlue" as to me they im
15 matches
Mail list logo
