On Friday, April 27, 2012 1:06:06 AM UTC+2, Victor Hooi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any news on the Django Admin rewrite front?
>
I'm very interested in this topic and have some time to kill so I started
the wiki page don't hesitate to comment, correct, review and add you own
ideas.
On Friday, December 7, 2012 9:07:32 PM UTC+1, Zach Borboa wrote:
>
> Does something like this exist already? If not, it should.
How this can be useful ? You still need to write the view in Python then
why not write the urls in Python too, like it's currently the way to go.
If something in
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 5:05:36 AM UTC+1, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Amirouche B.
> > wrote:
>
>> Héllo,
>>
>> Everything is in the title. Does Django core dev's want to have localized
>> documentation in main repository
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Amirouche B. wrote:
> Héllo,
>
> Everything is in the title. Does Django core dev's want to have localized
> documentation in main repository or should it be managed by local DUG ?
>
Yes :-)
In a perfect world, you'd be able to
Héllo,
Everything is in the title. Does Django core dev's want to have localized
documentation in main repository or should it be managed by local DUG ?
Thanks to Pilot Systems, I improved a bit the french documentation
[1] basically what I've done is converted it to use the Sphinx support of
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Travis Swicegood wrote:
> Is there a wiki page on the admin and changes that are planned for it?
> This comes up every few months with a "hey, I've done X with the admin,
> can we just use it to replace/update contrib.admin?" Would be nice
I'm only using Django 1.1 as part of CI tests, and they have started
failing recently because of this, so I'd be happy to see it fixed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
Is there a wiki page on the admin and changes that are planned for it? This
comes up every few months with a "hey, I've done X with the admin, can we just
use it to replace/update contrib.admin?" Would be nice to have everyone's (and
by everyone's, I mean Idan's) thoughts on where the admin
I'm not sure if it's worth mentioning ...
2. Secure CRUD one-liner goal
The new admin app should, like the current admin app, allow the user to
enable full secure (permission-based) CRUD in one line of code.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 10:13:03 PM UTC+2, Idan Gazit wrote:
> As I wrote, I'd like to have a clear idea of what a new admin will
> accomplish before starting to bolt on enhancements, even great enhancements
> like grappelli.
>
> The admin was an impressively future-proof design, given
The problem with the external app approach is that it will break the
integration between different apps. There is no way to avoid it.
Besides, developing something for the django.contrib.admin with an UI up to
the recent standards is quite difficult.
Going Bootstrap is not only the thing of the
There are *many* apps providing bootstrap templates for
django.contrib.admin, here a few:
- https://github.com/michaelhelmick/django-bootstrap-admin
- https://github.com/gkuhn1/django-admin-templates-twitter-bootstrap
- https://github.com/riccardo-forina/django-admin-bootstrapped
-
>
> >
> > Idan - you mentioned you'd like to get thoughts on what we hope to achieve
> > in a new admin - basically, what is the purpose of Django's contrib.admin -
> > is that right?
If I'm not mistaken the new admin interface couldn't be builded because none of
the django core developers had
13 matches
Mail list logo