Re: Challenge teaching Django to beginners: urls.py

2016-09-14 Thread Curtis Maloney
Somewhere I have code to provide a "parse" based URL router. Will dig it up now 1.10 has has shipped On 14 September 2016 6:38:20 PM AEST, Florian Apolloner wrote: >Hi Emil, > >On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 9:50:22 PM UTC+2, Emil Stenström >wrote: >> >> and more experienced users are expect

Re: Challenge teaching Django to beginners: urls.py

2016-09-14 Thread Emil Stenström
On Tuesday, 13 September 2016 21:54:49 UTC+2, ludovic coues wrote: > > There is third party module providing third party url function. Surlex > [1] have been mentionned. But any third party solution will need to > provide function compatible with django.conf.urls.url. > Line 64 of django/urls/

Re: Challenge teaching Django to beginners: urls.py

2016-09-14 Thread Emil Stenström
See Sjoerd's code in a later reply to this thread, let's start experimenting there. /E On Tuesday, 13 September 2016 22:17:34 UTC+2, Ares Ou wrote: > > Emil, > > Please count me in if you'd like to start a new DEP. I'm also > very interested to take this new challenge. And maybe we > should div

Re: Challenge teaching Django to beginners: urls.py

2016-09-14 Thread Emil Stenström
Great initiative! I really think you should use the flask syntax instead of the rails one that I first suggested. Seems this is the consensus from this thread, and that makes it more likely to get it to core one day. /Emil On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 11:02:23 UTC+2, Sjoerd Job Postmus wro

Re: Trac spam attack / spam filter reactivated

2016-09-14 Thread Tim Graham
The difficulty is tuning the spam weights. We had spammers completing capchas and getting their posts through. On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 6:29:40 PM UTC-4, Zach wrote: > > I'm also trying to cc myself on tickets only to get "Submission rejected > as potential spam". Can we incorporate t

Re: Trac spam attack / spam filter reactivated

2016-09-14 Thread Zach
I'm also trying to cc myself on tickets only to get "Submission rejected as potential spam". Can we incorporate this ?. I've had better luck completing that verification. -- You received this message because y

Re: Sonar for the Django rpoject

2016-09-14 Thread Ivan Sevastoyanov
Hello, Here is my blog post about setting up SonarQube. I think it takes about 15 minutes, so you can run it yourself if you want (and if you have time of course). Have a good day! Regards, Ivan On Friday, S

Re: Contributing to Django

2016-09-14 Thread Andromeda Yelton
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.10/internals/contributing/ :) On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 4:29 PM, wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I found Django interesting and so, I want to contribute to it. I am > learning OOP , web development. I have done a course in C language. My > mathematics is good. Please

Re: Withdrawing Channels from 1.10

2016-09-14 Thread Pietro Spagnulo
Just want to share my emotional support for your astonishing job. God bless you. On Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 6:40:01 PM UTC+2, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'm going to withdraw the Channels patch for consideration for 1.10; > there's a lot more concern and uncertainty around it tha

Re: Django Channels Load Testing Results

2016-09-14 Thread Chris Foresman
Yes. Honestly, just explain what these results mean in words, because I cannot turn these graphs into anything meaningful on my own. On Monday, September 12, 2016 at 8:41:05 PM UTC-5, Robert Roskam wrote: > > Hey Chris, > > The goal of these tests is to see how channels performs with normal HTT

Re: Challenge teaching Django to beginners: urls.py

2016-09-14 Thread sjoerdjob
Hi all, Since it seemed like an interesting idea to me, I started development of a third-party plugin. It's currently at: https://github.com/sjoerdjob/django-simple-url Since I only started today, I have no readme/setup.py yet. Will come later this week I hope. Current usage is from

Re: Challenge teaching Django to beginners: urls.py

2016-09-14 Thread Florian Apolloner
Hi Emil, On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 9:50:22 PM UTC+2, Emil Stenström wrote: > > and more experienced users are expected to switch over to using regexes > directly to get the exact behavior they want. > How so? Personally I would use this quite quickly since a few builtin types would cov