Hello,
> On 29 Mar 2017, at 01:05, qingnian...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> the best library to replace Watchdog is Watchman, a library that supports
> both of these three platforms (for Windows it's still in the alpha stage.)
Django currently doesn't use Watchdog. Watchdog is a cross-platform Python
Anyone working on this project should at least be aware of
https://github.com/Pylons/hupper (based on work David Glick and I
originally did in https://github.com/carljm/wsgiwatcher), which aims to
be a framework-agnostic solution to this problem for any Python web
project. Docs at http://docs.pylon
Consider the following piece of code:
@receiver(pre_save, sender=MyModel)
def my_handler(sender, **kwargs):
instance = kwargs['instance']
if instance.verified:
do_something(instance)
else:
do_else(instance)
Its good, because it keeps `MyModel` decoupled from `do_some
When you are creating a system from scratch, coming with a ideal and
organized model is simple enough, but when you are trying to replicate a
real world system/issue into your models, things get complicated.
By complicated I mean, almost every relationship is a M2M with intermediary
fields, tha
There's an accepted ticket about adding pre_update and post_update signals:
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21461. From a quick glance, I think
this is what you're proposing.
On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 4:28:00 PM UTC-4, Todor Velichkov wrote:
>
> Consider the following piece of code:
>
Hi Gabriel,
Yes, the hope is to make the situation better and more standard. Here's
some of the status:
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24317 - real reverse fields.
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/897 - real reverse many to many fields
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12203 - many
The problem with passing the queryset is that it's possible that some
object is added to or removed from the queryset between the pre_update and
actual update execution. To avoid this the execution should go somewhere
along the lines of:
1) if there is pre_update or post_update do stages 2-5,
Hi Carl,
Thanks for mentioning this awesome project! I saw it in one of the
discussions but did not take a close look. I'll definitely check this out
and try to integrate wsgiwatcher/watcher.py into Django.
On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 7:47:13 AM UTC-7, Carl Meyer wrote:
>
> Anyone working o
Hi Brice,
Thanks for the suggestion! I'm not sure whether if I can successfully
implement a library like you've mentioned, so for now I might stick with
the Watch* libraries available. I really love the goals you've listed and
would add these to my proposal.
David Ma
On Thursday, March 30, 2
