Re: Feature request: Abstract ManyToManyField

2011-02-04 Thread Mike Lindsey
the schedule for this project, so I'll see if I can't get a workable patch done to submit back. If not, then I'll go file the feature request. -- Mike Lindsey -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to thi

Re: Feature request: Abstract ManyToManyField

2011-02-04 Thread Mike Lindsey
model for the reverse reference. -- -- Mike Lindsey -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-

Re: Feature request: Abstract ManyToManyField

2011-02-04 Thread Mike Lindsey
)s_hostgroup' like: HostGroups<-> Hosts Or is a tree-like structure like: ...<-> HostGroups1<-> Hosts1<-> HostGroups2<-> Hosts2<-> Where HostGroup2 has a relationship to Hosts1 and a separate relationship to Hosts2? -- Mike Lindsey -- Y

Re: Feature request: Abstract ManyToManyField

2011-02-04 Thread Mike Lindsey
') I'm manipulating the data via standard admin forms, with fieldsets and filter_horizontal. All the other options I've come across for this kind of data model don't work with fieldsets OR filter_horizontal. On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 22:36, Mike Lindsey<mike-dja...@5dninja.net> wrote: I'm

Feature request: Abstract ManyToManyField

2011-02-03 Thread Mike Lindsey
b finishes successfully. What would make this exceptionally easy, is if there was the option to set 'abstract=True' on second iteration of each of the ManyToManyFields, telling syncdb to not attempt to create it. Thoughts? -- Mike Lindsey -- You received this message because you are subscribed to