Standalon Django ORM

Hi, Given the small number of Django ORM maintainers, making the ORM standalone will, among other things, increase the adoption of Django and bring in new maintainers. An ORM inspired by Django ORM with over 3000+ stars: https://github.com/tortoise/tortoise-orm -- You received this messag

Re: Combining multiple aggregations with annotate()

one multi-valued > relationship (n-to-many). > > Simon > > [0] https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/33403 > > > > Le mercredi 5 janvier 2022 à 09:59:24 UTC-5, Yonas a écrit : > >> In that case, at least there should be a warning message in the >> documentatio

Re: Decision on a 2FA PR

Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 11:06:41 AM UTC+3 carlton...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Yonas. > > Thanks for your input here. > > Two points: > >- I *think* one reason Django doesn't already have 2fa itself is that >available methods have (up to now) each been

Re: Decision on a 2FA PR

conversation. On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 11:06:41 AM UTC+3 carlton...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Yonas. > > Thanks for your input here. > > Two points: > >- I *think* one reason Django doesn't already have 2fa itself is that >available methods have (up to now) e

Decision on a 2FA PR

Hi, In light of what happened to the ctx package, this is a good time to get a conclusion on the following topic. I opened a PR based on an accepted ticket and a discussion

Re: Blocking disposable or temporary email addresses

Would syncing the block list from repos like https://github.com/disposable-email-domains/disposable-email-domains (actively maintained since 2014) ease the burden of updating the list? On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 12:44:28 AM UTC+3 James Bennett wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 2:21 PM Yo

Blocking disposable or temporary email addresses

Hi, Hope everyone is doing well! What does the community think about adding a feature to Django where disposable or temporary emails are not accepted during account registration? Best, Yonas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django devel

Re: MFA (2FA)

d easily enough say both "Yes, this is a good option, let's include it" > and "This package should be removed now". > > Kind Regards, > > Carlton > > On Thursday, 7 April 2022 at 20:55:32 UTC+2 Tobias Bengfort wrote: > >> Hi Yonas, >&g

Re: MFA (2FA)

Hi Florian, WebAuthn promotes password-less authentication, so let’s treat it as an alternative to the Django auth system while implementing 2FA for the password-based Django auth. On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 8:56:18 PM UTC+3 f.apo...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Yonas, > > On Friday, Apri

Re: MFA (2FA)

nducted by Microsoft, a user account is "99.9% less likely to be compromised if" the user uses MFA. So, it would be beneficial to have this feature in Django. On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 9:55:32 PM UTC+3 Tobias Bengfort wrote: > Hi Yonas, > > the best place to start is probab

MFA (2FA)

. Otherwise, what do you think about bringing a third-party QR code generator into core? If both options are not feasible, displaying the secret key to the user is another alternative (not ideal). But the developer has the freedom to install a third-party package and show the QR code. Best, Yonas

Re: Combining multiple aggregations with annotate()

bout the issue. > Il giorno mercoledì 5 gennaio 2022 alle 15:13:17 UTC+1 Yonas ha scritto: > >> Hello, >> >> There's a ticket <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10060> opened 13 >> years ago explaining a problem with combining multiple aggregations wi

Combining multiple aggregations with annotate()

Hello, There's a ticket opened 13 years ago explaining a problem with combining multiple aggregations with annotate(). And the solution appears to be documenting