On 7/4/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fingers crossed about that lame-assed ORM patent -- so I'll do what
Patents don't have much to do with copyright. ;-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:05 PM, Jan Claeys wrote:
>> From Wikipedia[1]:
>
> Under the U.S. Copyright Act, a transfer of ownership in
> copyright must be memorialized in a writing signed by the
> transferor. For that purpose, ownership in copyright includes
> exclusive
Jan.
a CLA protects from people changing their minds as well, and in some
cases actually
assets that the person assigning the copyright over is the actual owner.
from my point of view it should be weighed up as follows:
cons of having people sign a CLA:
- about 20 minutes if they are an
On wo, 2006-06-21 at 13:52 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> We don't; my conversations with the company lawyers seemed to
> indicate that you're implicitly assigning copyright simply by
> submitting code to an OSS project. Of course IANAL, but I'm going to
> trust what the ones we talked
On wo, 2006-06-21 at 13:52 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> We don't; my conversations with the company lawyers seemed to
> indicate that you're implicitly assigning copyright simply by
> submitting code to an OSS project. Of course IANAL, but I'm going to
> trust what the ones we talked
On 6/21/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We don't; my conversations with the company lawyers seemed to
> indicate that you're implicitly assigning copyright simply by
> submitting code to an OSS project. Of course IANAL, but I'm going to
> trust what the ones we talked to say
Hi, all.
Do you guys have any guidelines with regard to copyright when
accepting contributions from others? Does copyright need to be
assigned to Lawrence Journal-World when submitting to Django? Or do
programmers retain copyright and assign the code to the project under
the BSD license? (I
