On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Arien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:59 PM, David Durham, Jr.
>>> <[EMAIL
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Arien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:59 PM, David Durham, Jr.
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nice thing about GETs is that users aren't confronted with
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Um, this is intentional and a good thing. If you read the spec, not
> only is the difference between GET and POST defined, but the way user
> agents (browsers) should treat them is defined as well. Breaking the
> back &
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:59 PM, David Durham, Jr.
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Nice thing about GETs is that users aren't confronted with the dreaded
>> "Data was submitted with POST" confirmation, which is
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:59 PM, David Durham, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nice thing about GETs is that users aren't confronted with the dreaded
> "Data was submitted with POST" confirmation, which is confusing to
> most people and usually not tested. Basically you end up breaking the
>
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:59 PM, David Durham, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> form, and are redirected to a GET for the next step. In this case,
> the POST disappears from the user's history (refresh and reload work
> as expected).
Sorry, reload and back work as expected ...
-Dave
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was thinking the FormWizard should allow GET to be used on all but
> the last step, or should allow configuration of what to method to use.
>
> Forms aren't just for posting.
>
> Any interest in this?
Nice thing about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 1, 2008, at 18:56, Honza Král wrote:
> That's -1 from me. I am not opposed to the idea in general, I just
> don't feel it's needed and should be in the code.
Sounds more like a -0 to me. -1 is, as far as I
have seen, strong rejection.
that would look really terrible with the hashes in the URL, that's why
I avoided GET, it would be easy to factor it out and even allow for
data to be passed in URL (I have no idea why somebody would want that,
but why not ;) ) but I just don't think it would make sense.
Forms aren't just for
I was thinking the FormWizard should allow GET to be used on all but
the last step, or should allow configuration of what to method to use.
Forms aren't just for posting.
Any interest in this?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
10 matches
Mail list logo
