On Jan 16, 2008 1:27 PM, Jorge Gajon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2008 8:57 AM, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/12/08, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > The moderation could be done by member(s) whose time wouldn't be spent
> > > enhancing
On 1/12/08, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The moderation could be done by member(s) whose time wouldn't be spent
> enhancing django. I used to volunteer on python.org to maintain the
> Python Jobs Board, because I wanted to help out, but I wasn't able to
> contribute in ways that
On 12-Jan-08, at 6:27 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> The moderation could be done by member(s) whose time wouldn't be spent
> enhancing django. I used to volunteer on python.org to maintain the
> Python Jobs Board, because I wanted to help out, but I wasn't able to
> contribute in ways that other
The moderation could be done by member(s) whose time wouldn't be spent
enhancing django. I used to volunteer on python.org to maintain the
Python Jobs Board, because I wanted to help out, but I wasn't able to
contribute in ways that other people already were (sysadmin stuff).
Perhaps if
On Jan 12, 2008 7:48 PM, Simon Greenhill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The major problem is that someone has to moderate. Who does this?
> Moderating would take a non-trivial amount of time - especially on the
> high traffic django-users. Wouldn't we rather have djangonauts
> enhancing django
The major problem is that someone has to moderate. Who does this?
Moderating would take a non-trivial amount of time - especially on the
high traffic django-users. Wouldn't we rather have djangonauts
enhancing django than cleaning up spam?
I suspect that most people following the lists are
On Jan 5, 2008 9:31 AM, shabda.raaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In some of the groups like turbo gears I see a policy where the first
> time posters post are held for moderation, and once they are approved
> the posters can then post without any moderation. This is what the
> turbogears