Ticket #11107 needs review (was Re: Postgres error with syncdb and flush.)

2009-05-13 Thread J. Cliff Dyer
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:31 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote: > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:40 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote: > > [...] but it occurs to me that if through=MyModel is set on the > > ManyToMany, the sequence on MyModel will already be handled by the loop > > at line 112. I think I can code up

Re: Ticket #11107 needs review (was Re: Postgres error with syncdb and flush.)

2009-05-14 Thread J. Cliff Dyer
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 17:20 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote: > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:31 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:40 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote: > > > > [...] but it occurs to me that if through=MyModel is set on the > > > ManyToMany, the sequence on MyModel will alre