On 1/27/06, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That raises a wider question: do we want to singularize those field
> names as well? It's more of a cosmetic issue, as it doesn't affect
> the core of the table-name-generating code -- but it would induce more
> breakage as applied to the
On 1/27/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I haven't been following the magic removal branch closely, but here:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RemovingTheMagic
>
> There is a migration script for mysql. This line looks wrong:
> ALTER TABLE auth_groups_permissions RENAME TO
On 1/27/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a migration script for mysql. This line looks wrong:
> ALTER TABLE auth_groups_permissions RENAME TO auth_group_permissions;
>
> Rename to the same name?
> Perhaps:
> ALTER TABLE auth_groups_permissions RENAME TO
I haven't been following the magic removal branch closely, but here:
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RemovingTheMagic
There is a migration script for mysql. This line looks wrong:
ALTER TABLE auth_groups_permissions RENAME TO auth_group_permissions;
Rename to the same name?
Perhaps:
ALTER
